Inside the numbers on Boise State's win over Toledo [BIFFF]
There were many stars (and one Andromeda galaxy quarterback) in Friday night's Bronco win over Toledo, and one of the most surprising ones was Boise State running back Drew Wright. The local Vallivue High prospect carried five times for 29 yards and a touchdown on the Broncos' final drive, bringing back memories of Boise State "closer" Jarvis Hodge. Wright has some weight to gain and a beard to grow, but otherwise, it was a brilliant impersonation.
How good was Wright against Toledo? How about this: His success rate was 100%. Every carry picked up either a first down, a touchdown, or enough yards to set up a second-and-short or third-and-short. Was that Brock Forsey out there or were Mark Johnson's eyes deceiving him?
More advanced stats analysis after the jump.
What is BIFFF? And does it have anything to do with Back to the Future? Details here.
The rest of the BIFFF statistics from the Boise State - Toledo game
Success Rate
Success rate by quarter (team)
Q1 // Boise State 35%, Toledo 29%
Q2 // Boise State 52%, Toledo 37%
Q3 // Boise State 48%, Toledo 36%
Q4 // Boise State 58%, Toledo 46%
After a first quarter of ups and downs, both teams turned it on in quarters two, three, and four. Boise State just turned it on a whole lot more. Every other play for Boise State was a successful one, and had their timing been a little better (i.e., saving successful plays for third and fourth downs), the final score would have been a lot uglier than 40-15.
Compared to the Georgia game, the defense failed to maintain its gold standard in stuffing the opposite offense, but a sterling silver standard ain't that bad, either.
Quarterback success rate
Boise State
Kellen Moore - 25 for 42 (60%)
Toledo
Terrance Owens - 12 for 31 (39%)
Austin Dantin - 3 for 8 (38%)
Want to know the difference in the game? This is it. Kellen Moore was uber-efficient and Austin Terrance Dantin-Owens were less efficient.
Running back success rate
Boise State
Doug Martin - 7 for 19 (37%)
D.J. Harper - 3 for 7 (43%)
Toledo
Adonis Thomas - 8 for 14 (57%)
Martin had a better game Friday night than he did in the opener against Georgia, although I think fans (like me) expect him to be successful on every single carry regardless of how many defenders are in the backfield with him.
Note the high success rate for Adonis Thomas. Credit goes to Thomas for being squirmy and to Boise State's tackling for being highly suspect. Either way, I'll be happy never to see Thomas again.
Wide receiver success rate
Boise State
Mitch Burroughs - 5 for 6 (83%)
Matt Miller - 6 for 6 (100%)
Doug Martin - 3 for 5 (60%)
Tyler Shoemaker - 3 for 4 (75%)
Kirby Moore - 3 for 4 (75%)
Toledo
Bernard Reedy - 3 for 4 (75%)
Eric Page -56 for 8 (75%)
Receiver success rate accounts for catches and not targets, which is how Miller can be a perfect 6-for-6 despite having one of the team's two drops. Since receivers are supposed to average 8+ yards per reception, you would expect their success rates to be high. Still, I think holding Eric Page to five six successes all game is a big win for the Bronco D.
Successful plays are defined as plays that gain 50 percent of needed yards on first down, 70 percent of needed yards on second down, and 100 percent of needed yards on third and fourth downs.
Stops
Defensive line stops
Tyler Horn - 2.5
Tyrone Crawford - 2
Shea McClellin - 2
Jarrell Root - 2
Chase Baker - 2
Billy Winn - 2
Greg Grimes - 1
Linebacker stops
Aaron Tevis - 2
Byron Hout - 0.5
J.C. Percy - 0.5
Secondary stops
Cedric Febis - 4
Jerrell Gavins - 4
George Iloka - 1
Jamar Taylor - 1
Cedric Febis, everybody! Boy, it sure was good to have him back.
The Bronco defensive line came out looking a lot better in these stats than it seemed they would have. They had a relatively quiet night for being them. I felt Tyrone Crawford was the most disruptive lineman. Tyler Horn earned the most stops, but one came on a garbage time sack.
Stops are defined as plays that prevent a successful play by the offense.
Line Yards
Boise State - 115 yards, 38 attempts, 3.0 average
Toledo - 73 yards, 28 attempts, 2.6 average
The Broncos averaged 2.4 line yards per carry against Georgia, so the Bronco running game was vastly improved. Not sure if that came across on the TV or not.
Line yards measure the effectiveness of offensive line play by assigning value to rushing yards gained near the line of scrimmage. View the complete formula.
Swing Points and Wasted Yards
Swing points
Boise State - 0
Toledo - 0
Wasted yards
Boise State - 203
Toledo - 178
Boise State is two-for-two on stopping world-class return men from breaking long returns for scores. And still, we wait for the first Bronco defensive touchdown of the year. My money is on Michael Atkinson picking off a screen pass and rumbling for a TD. What can I say? I like fat guy touchdowns.
Swing points account for points scored on defense, special teams, or drives of 25 yards or less. Wasted yards are the yards gained on non-scoring drives.
Field Position Percentage
Boise State - 56%
Toledo - 34%
The Broncos had virtually the same field position percentage against Toledo that they had against Georgia. So from here on out, I guess teams should just plan on Boise State having the ball in their territory half the time.
Field Position Percentage shows the percentage of a team's plays that took place on their opponent's side of the field. The higher the number, the better. Good teams have over 40 percent. Great teams get over 50 percent.
Special Teams Rating
Boise State - (-2)
Toledo - (-2)
It was a rough night for special teams. You probably didn't need advanced stats to tell you that.
The special teams rating is based on a points formula where each special team occurrence is weighed and valued for factors like points, field position, and more. View the full explanation and check out its origins.
Additional reading ...
In addition to these statistics, BIFFF documents a wide range of play-by-play and game charting data for a comprehensive look at Boise State football games. In other words, nerd alert! To find out more, visit the BIFFF homepage or peruse the BIFFF archived spreadsheets on Google Docs.
Your turn
Feel better about the Toledo game having seen these stats? Think Drew Wright is destined for fan favorite status? Still expecting Doug Martin to have successful carries every single time he touches the ball? Share your thoughts in the comments.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Forgive my mathiness
Eric Page – 5 for 8 (75%)
Doesn’t 5 for 8 = 62.5%?
"Shiloh Keo got a MOUTHFUL of Doug Martin!" - Joe Tessitore
@D_Summit
Math'd!
Is it counterintuitive to root for both Boise State and the Yankees?
by NYBroncosFan on Sep 20, 2011 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions
Forgive my proofreadiness
It’s a sickness, and I can’t help myself.
I think the breakdown of plays and numbers (pre- and post-game) are my favorite material on OBNUG. Thanks for educating us fans, and thanks for enduring my error-correcting ways!
"Shiloh Keo got a MOUTHFUL of Doug Martin!" - Joe Tessitore
@D_Summit
munson'd breakdowns
"Shiloh Keo got a MOUTHFUL of Doug Martin!" - Joe Tessitore
@D_Summit
by D_Summit on Sep 20, 2011 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
that is very close to a double negative.
"Boise State better never have to explain itself, prove itself or apologize for where it comes from to anybody ever again." Steve Greenberg TSN
by boiseblues on Sep 20, 2011 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
or a redundancy, depending.
"Boise State better never have to explain itself, prove itself or apologize for where it comes from to anybody ever again." Steve Greenberg TSN
by boiseblues on Sep 20, 2011 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
Or a Psychiatrist"s wet dream in billable hours
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
by kcam on Sep 21, 2011 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Perfect! rec'd and loving it.
wish I could rec it twice—once for the psychiatrist and once for the billable hours.
"Boise State better never have to explain itself, prove itself or apologize for where it comes from to anybody ever again." Steve Greenberg TSN
"Munson'd breakdowns"
A psychocanalyst’s retirement annuity stream. Or a second house. Or that pimp ride. Or a luxury boat. Or a…
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
by kcam on Sep 21, 2011 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Quarterback success rate.
Last year 1/2 of the QBs in the NCAA could not complete 60% of their passes. Kellen is completing 60% of his passes for yardage that he needs to manage the game.
Swing Points and Wasted Yards
Credit to our Defense. Kellen’s interception was returned to BSU’s 19 yard line and our defense held them to a…. Fumble.
More props to our Defense.
BSU has had two turnovers this year. Each time our Defense has gotten the ball back withing 3 plays.
Is it me, or does Hout not appear to be as effective as last year? Lingering effects of injury perhaps?
tvmunson
I agree that he has not been effective.
But I didn’t think he was particularly effective last year either. I really only remember seeing JC Percy make noticeable plays, with some Tevis sprinkled in. Maybe my Hout-dar is malfunctioning, but I hardly notice when he’s on the field.
Ok, Hout-dar is a stretch, I know.
I'm just sayin...
By adding "I'm just sayin'..." within this signature, I hereby absolve any post containing this quote, including the one above, of any formal claim of accuracy of any kind.Therefore, this post, or any preceding this signature, is not subject to any form of scrutiny, and is likewise never to be taken as combative nor offensive by any party either directly or indirectly addressed by it. This is binding, and any breach of the above contract, which the reading party enters willingly or unwillingly, will be addressed via reply by of another post also containing the above, all absolving quote of "I'm just sayin..." and immunity of the post and the binding contract of the reading party will repeat, ad infinitum, so as long as the reading party expresses disagreement or offense of any kind.
by Xavier Malawi on Sep 20, 2011 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Call me crazy
but I think by the end of the year Harper will end up with a better rushing stat line than Martin. It just seems they’re almost identical except that Harper is a little more elusive and maybe a little faster. Either way BSU has 2 exceptional RBs with guys that could be potentially better hurt or redshirting. With Harper probably getting a 6th year, the future is bright at the RB positon for sure.
by BluManU on Sep 20, 2011 2:30 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Nailed it; Martin slightly better in the bone, but basically Harper can do everything Doug can do, plus has that Gayle Sayres
quality, you can’t even put a name to it, elusive is close but even when you grab him he just gets to the daylight somehow. If Harper gets another year, and Boise State staff sound optimistic, we’ll him him at #1 and Johnson and Ajayi fightin for #2; a nice situation.
tvmunson
I suspect
most defenses also key on Martin. If you consider it, at best Doug can be contained, not stopped. He still does his job by pounding the defense (not vice-versa) and allowing Harper to run. Either way, what a great tandem!
Agreed.
I also have noticed that a lot of “backuep” RBs that have a marked drop in carries compared to the RB1, often have better YPC. Of course I do have, nor will I provide any actual data to back up that statement, just something I’ve noticed along the way.
I'm just sayin...
By adding "I'm just sayin'..." within this signature, I hereby absolve any post containing this quote, including the one above, of any formal claim of accuracy of any kind.Therefore, this post, or any preceding this signature, is not subject to any form of scrutiny, and is likewise never to be taken as combative nor offensive by any party either directly or indirectly addressed by it. This is binding, and any breach of the above contract, which the reading party enters willingly or unwillingly, will be addressed via reply by of another post also containing the above, all absolving quote of "I'm just sayin..." and immunity of the post and the binding contract of the reading party will repeat, ad infinitum, so as long as the reading party expresses disagreement or offense of any kind.
by Xavier Malawi on Sep 20, 2011 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions

by 


















