The Mountain West blog roundtable: On expansion, UTEP, and hipster mustaches
by Kevan Lee on Mar 4, 2011 12:00 PM PST
in Boise State football
Email
Print
As a way to stay up-to-date and informed but mostly just to talk trash, I enlisted six of the most knowledgeable Mountain West minds on the Internet to participate in a monthly chat about a hot MWC story.
This month's topic: Should the Mountain West add more teams?
Read on for the opus on all things expansion, and check out the first Mountain West Power Poll at the bottom. Guess who's in first? I'm starting to like this Mountain West thing.
Meet the press:
- Wyoming - Matt - Cowboy Altitude
- Mountain West - Jeremy - Mountain West Connection
- TCU - Ben - Mountain West Connection
- Colorado State - Ian - Mountain West Connection
- UNLV - Jacob - Mountain West Connection
- San Diego State - Sam - Mountain West Connection
- Boise State - Kevan - OBNUG
This month's topic: Should the Mountain West add more teams?
Ready ... go!
Kevan (Boise State):
When the topic of expansion comes up, I am torn between wanting what is practical and wanting Craig Thompson to blow the whole thing up, merge with C-USA, hold his own postseason tournament, and dance on the pre-purchased cremation box of Jim Delany. But practicality usually wins out. Stupid practicality.
I do not want the Mountain West to expand for one main reason: the BCS. Craig Thompson was right when he floated the theoretical of a zero-loss Mountain West team going undefeated only to lose in a Mountain West championship game that a) doesn't need to exist and b) costs the conference millions of dollars in BCS payouts. Thompson has a point. And what glorious hair!
"I know, right?"
Once Utah and TCU leave, the non-BCS teams have a much easier road to a BCS game. Keep in mind: a non-BCS team only needs to finish No. 12 to get an automatic bid. That's something even UNLV could do, I'd imagine. With the way the college football world works right now, there are far worse things than being in a conference where your champion is the favorite for a BCS berth every year.
***
Ian (Colorado State):
Expansion seems like a win, lose, lose for most MWC teams. The MWC/CUSA in my eyes ends up worse than the old MWC with a BYU/Utah/TCU powerhouse structure. The haters can just look at a deeper weaker conference and keep teams out of the big bowl games. Beating eight average teams is no different than being the best of 16 average teams. Unless C-USA starts getting some big time programs, I don't see the expansion being worth it. The power structure of the MWC will be weak with BYU, Utah, and TCU leaving.
That structure will soon be Boise St. all alone, so no wonder OBNUG doesn't want expansion. They can schedule a hard non conference opponent and then coast through conference play, until they head to Nevada. WIDE LEFT! Too early?
OBNUG, I agree with you, but I got to get my shots in cause I am not sure the Rams will do it for me on the field. And as you said, a non-BCS team only needs to finish top 12 to get an automatic bid. The Rams might get that lucky if the stars and home schedule line up.
Another perk to keeping the path to the BCS easy for the MWC champion is money sharing. CSU being near the bottom of funding is always a reminder for me to root for TCU or whoever has the best shot at bringing home some dough to the lil guys. That plays into the travel/ travel expense argument for the small money MWC teams.
In the end it is about making your team better and giving them a better shot at a bowl game. CSU gets further away from that goal with expansion.
***
Jacob (UNLV):
Should the Mountain West expand? Yes. But not right now. Right now UTEP has stated that they would stay in C-USA if they got an invite. If the Big East decides to make the football side of the conference go up to 10 or 12, then they will probably take SMU and Houston. At that point, the Texas schools have broken rank and UTEP probably would accept an invite to the Mountain West.
The Miners are the best expansion candidate out there and for many reasons. They bring the El Paso market, and can deliver it. They have an OK football program with good attendance numbers. Their basketball program is very good and would only add to what the MWC already has going for them. They put the MWC back in Texas. And the list goes on... The point is that UTEP adds a ton to the MWC in every aspect when it comes to expansion.
The only problem with expansion is the question of who would be the 12th team. There really isn't a clear cut option for a 12th team as both SMU and Houston would expand the conference's footprint pretty far, Utah State sucks at football, and Montana and San Jose State are FCS teams (San Jose State is a FCS team, right?).
No, Jacob, I am not sure they are.
My vote for the 12th team would go to Utah State, and there are many reasons - good or bad - depending on your perspective. USU is in Utah, the geographical center of our conference. With Utah and BYU leaving, there will be a giant hole in our footprint, and USU fills that up. Logan, Utah, is technically a part of the greater Salt Lake City area, and with The Mtn. already on basic cable in that area, I'm sure the cable company would appreciate not having to change their channel lineup.
As long as the channel stays on basic cable in that area, that means that the channel will be delivered to the 32nd largest city in the U.S. That may not mean much to us, but it does to the TV executives. Here is my explanation of why from one of my posts on Mountain West Connection:
People don't have to subscribe specifically to The Mtn. All they have to do is subscribe to the package the Cable company offers with it. i.e. With the new reach in Atlanta, The Mtn. is on the same package as NFL Red Zone. Without knowing it, tons of people will subscribe to The Mtn. as well as NFL Redzone and the MWC makes money off of it.
Although almost no one in Salt Lake City will watch The Mtn, people will subscribe to the channel and give the MWC more money.
As well as markets, USU brings in a Top 25 basketball program and a budding football program. They went 5-7 last season and beat BYU. With the WAC being so weak this year, it's very possible for them to make a bowl game. Not to mention they are planning on expanding their stadium from 19,000 to 30,000 very soon. Utah State is better than it looks like on the outside.
For the twelfth basketball member, I think we should add Gonzaga. They are a very good basketball program. They don't have a football program, so they won't need to find a place for that program to go to. And they are in Spokane, which is a relatively big media market we could add.
Under this configuration, the MWC would have these major markets: San Diego, Fresno, El Paso, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Spokane, Denver, Albequerque. They would also have these basketball teams proven to be good: UNLV, SDSU, CSU, UNM, UTEP, USU, Gonzaga. That's 7 good basketball programs in the conference...
Like I said at the beginning of this e-mail, now is not the time to do this. We most likely won't be able to get UTEP until after another round of expansion by the Big 6 conferences and who knows who will be available after another round of expansion. If the super conferences happen, then Texas Tech would most likely be left out and Tech would be a much better addition than USU.
So in short, expansion is a good idea, just not right now.
***
Ben (TCU):
As a TCU fan I don't really have a dog in this fight. We're getting our golden ticket in 2012, and personally I am still pretty butt-hurt at the MWC for pulling the switcheroo on the Boise game, so I could really care less what happens to the MWC after we leave.
However if I were so inclined to offer some friendly advice to our soon to be ex-conference brethren, my advice would be to regain a foothold in Texas. I don't care how many TV sets it does or doesn't add because you should be doing it for one sole purpose: recruiting. Take a look at any MWC football roster, and you will see that it is littered with Texas athletes. A big part of that was TCU giving the MWC a foothold in the fertile recruiting grounds of Dallas-Fort Worth. If you don't refortify your position in Texas, that recruiting pipeline will dry up and your teams with no local recruiting base will whither away on the vine.
My advice to the MWC would be to add SMU and Houston, which would not only position the MWC in the two most fertile recruiting grounds that Texas has to offer but also the two largest media markets. Two birds, one hair. I would then split into two divisions of West (Boise State, Nevada, UNLV, SDSU, Fresno State, and Hawaii) and East (CSU, Wyoming, New Mexico, Air Force, SMU, and Houston). This way the West has a primary recruiting base in California, and the East has a primary recruiting base in Texas, which should assure the long-term health of all the MWC programs.
But like I said it's no skin off my nose if you decide to maintain the status quo and slowly fade away into obscurity because that is fine by me as well.
***
Kevan (Boise State):
OK, I'll admit that my rationale for avoiding expansion is slightly (very) selfish. No expansion means better odds that Boise State makes a BCS bowl, especially once TCU leaves. No offense to all you other MWC teams out there, but yeah, maybe some offense.
Also, yes, it's too soon for Nevada jokes. I laugh so I don't cry!
For those of you arguing in favor of expansion, what benefits are there other than getting a foothold in certain markets? El Paso alone ain't doing it for me.
***
Ben (TCU):
Another obvious benefit is the addition of a conference championship game. Having a championship game adds revenue to the conference and keeps the conference relevant during championship weekend when most everyone begins to forget about and dismiss the MWC.
Kevan's argument that a championship game could cost an undefeated team a BCS bid is valid, but it is the position of the uncompetitive and weakminded like the Bevo-10. If in the long-term the MWC wants respect and a place at the table, it will have to earn it the hard way, and adding a championship game is a piece of that puzzle.
***
Jeremy (impartial):
I'll take the side of being pro-expansion within the Mountain West, because if done right the Mountain West could make themselves better then the Big East on a permanent basis. There are really only two options regarding expansion for the Mountain West - add SMU and Houston or Utah State and UTEP. The reason UTEP is mentioned as being a solid market is because they are the only team in town and they draw well, and while their market size is not great, it is on par with Fresno State and Nevada. Plus, they have history with old-WAC teams with New Mexico, Colorado State, Air Force, and San Diego State. Utah State is a legit choice due to Comcast losing BYU and Utah, which carried The Mtn channel, and now the state that provided the most ad dollars are gone. From a competitive standpoint Utah State is not a good option. They are getting better but are not there yet.
Having said that, I strongly feel the only option is to take SMU and Houston. June Jones is building up SMU after years and years of suffering and he has the track record to make SMU a very good team. There is no reason that within a decade - or even sooner - he can have SMU on the same path that TCU has been traveling the past decade.
As for Houston, they have been an up-and-coming team back when Art Briles was the head coach and have kept that going with Kevin Sumlin. Comcast would love to add Houston for television sets even though Houston is low on the list of popularity in their city.
There are pros and cons to having a title game that have been mentioned like a 12-0 Boise State team losing to a 9-3 San Diego State team and costing the league BCS money, but exposure is key to building a league. The game would be on a Saturday and on Versus with the current television deal and should net somewhere near five million bucks. However, it would be up against one of the many other title games with now five of the six BCS leagues having a title game. That would hurt.
The only option for expansion should be SMU and Houston as they are the only schools that provide the league with the best chance to increase their BCS numbers.
***
Matt (Wyoming):
I'm a huge fan of expansion and expansion rumors but I feel the Mountain West did the right thing by not expanding in January. Besides geography, Utah State doesn't bring much to the table right now. And with their location and the demise of the WAC, they aren't going anywhere any time soon. Expanding to 12 teams right away just to add a championship is kind of pointless if it ruins the strength of the Mountain West.
We need to find schools that want stick with the Mountain West and fit with the other members. With the Big East still looking at expansion, it could make things interesting in the next couple months. If UCF gets picked off, then C-USA could be weakened enough that some of the Texas schools may finally look at jumping ship. I would also be interested to see what happens with the Big 12 and the stability of that conference moving forward. Baylor and Iowa State may be available in a few years and are established names that would bring more credibility.
So 12 teams would be great but not with the schools are available. Wyoming gets most of it's recruits east of the Rockies so I would be a fan of expansion back into Texas.
***
Ben (TCU):
If Baylor and Iowa State would bring more credibility to the conference, the MWC is in a lot worse shape than I thought.
***
Jeremy (impartial):
Got that right. If the Big 12 goes under because Texas goes the indy route, then look for Kansas and Kansas State to head to the Big East as reported a while back. Then the rest gets murky because Texas A&M has flirted with the SEC, and if the Aggies go to the SEC, then the super leagues are on their way. I dont see that happening due to the money not being there.
If Texas does go indy, expect the Big 12 to add three teams with the most likely additions being BYU, TCU heading back with their old SWC buddies, and the third could come from the MWC such as San Diego State who has been quietly talked about being part of the Big 12 expansion plans.
Getting off topic, but I just don't think MWC will be in a position to keep teams if the Big 12 comes calling for MWC schools to join their league.
***
Sam (San Diego State):
Gonna keep it short and sweet and echo basically what SDSU president Weber said... expansion would be nice, but there just isn't anyone out there we could add that is really any good that would add to the conference right now. Just gotta hold our cards and see what happens elsewhere.
FYI: this is what Stephen Weber looks like.
***
Kevan (Boise State):
The "No Expansion" camp is a lot smaller than I thought it would be (Hi, Ian!).
TV markets, recruiting, and championship game dollars are all solid reasons for expansion, but I keep coming back to the ultimate reason: the BCS. The Mountain West's goal is to gain an automatic spot in a BCS game for its conference champion. Does expansion make that happen? Not necessarily. It's like saying that if I hit the gym, get a haircut, buy a Saab, and memorize Hope Floats that the girl I'm crushing on will like me. She might. Or the muscle I build could be all in my thighs (adding San Jose State), the haircut I get could make me look like Ellen Degeneres (adding a conference championship game), and two years from now that girl could be into skinny, shaggy, shallow guys with hipster mustaches (the BCS changing its mind).
Point being, expansion does not guarantee an automatic BCS berth. So I vote we leave well enough alone.
***
Ben (TCU):
So just to clarify, Kevan has a hipster mustache? Also if I understood the analogy correctly there is no potential downside to memorizing Hope Floats or buying a SAAB? Man, this expansion stuff is more complicated than I thought.
***
Kevan (Boise State):
The downside to memorizing Hope Floats = you've memorized Hope Floats.
Rotten Tomatoes rating: Cuddly.
***
Jeremy (impartial):
Kevan's logic is what Craig Thompson was using by delaying the addition to add Boise State, but I still argue that had he added Boise State and TCU at the same time, the MWC might have earned an auto-bid and possibly kept around Utah, BYU, and TCU. Side tracking again, but Thompson kept saying that unless expansion brings the league an automatic BCS bid then there is no reason to expand ... well unless you want to take your competition by raiding the WAC out of spite for what BYU did, then every team is for gain.
Unless the league is going to get Houston and SMU, leave the league as it is.
***
Ian (Colorado State):
I am surprised more here are for expansion. Inviting more average teams for our average teams to lose to won't make any of us feel better. The additions of the WAC teams was good with me. Not sure why you want to see the Aztecs, Rebels, and Cowboys end up having to travel to Southern Miss and take a loss. Keep the travel simple and actually build some rivalries within the new MWC.
The recruiting to areas is a bit soft of an argument if you ask me. The Rams have been picking Florida kids ever since Steve Fairchild got here. They didn't get many from those areas before because Sonny Lubick wanted Colorado and California kids. Fairchild gets kids from Texas, Florida, and California because that's where the best athletes are. I am not sure a geographical team actually helps recruiting much, getting beat 40+ points in TCU every two years sure doesn't bolster recruiting from a logical perspective. If the reason an athlete picks a school is because they play a local team every two years, that kid has some bad decision making skills. If coaches go in and recruit an area, they will get kids out of it. CSU is looking for athletes, so they choose Florida, Texas, and California. If they wanted big, strong, corn-fed kids, they would go recruit Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Nebraska.
Go Huskers!
***
Jacob (UNLV):
With adding USU and UTEP, there would be no extra travel costs as well as a most likely easy win for the average teams in the MWC.
I really like the idea of adding USU and UTEP, but I would be fine if the MWC just stands pat and waits for other dominoes to fall around them. I was not fine with that in the case of adding Boise State and Co. In that scenario, the expansion candidates were very good and should have been brought on board earlier, but in this scenario, the candidates are average to bad football teams. Letting other dominoes fall around us could get us better teams such as Texas Tech.
At this point my idea would be to wait 4-5 years and see if any better candidates become available as well as give time for Utah St. And UTEP to possibly build up their football programs so that if we have to settle for them, they aren't too bad of an addition.
***
Ben (TCU):
Basically it just depends on what the MWC is looking for out of expansion and what the realistic goal is for the conference at this point. It seems a lot of you are holding on to the hopes of the MWC becoming a BCS auto-bid, but the harsh reality of the situation is that ship has sailed. The door closed after Utah and BYU left, and it got bolted shut when TCU got the Big East invite.
So just for the sake of the argument, agree with me that the BCS is a pipe dream for the MWC and tell me what your goal is for the conference.
Is it to maintain the status quo and exploit the non-AQ BCS loophole as long as possible? Great, then stay at ten and keep an eye out for a major shakeup down the line.
Is it to strengthen the TV numbers? Then add UTEP and Utah State. They would be a decent but not sexy addition with little to no upside, like hitting a single.
If the goal is to strengthen the conference as much as you can in the current state of college football, then you need to add SMU and Houston. Gives the conference teams with history, recruiting bases, large television markets, and they are as sexy a name out there right now. Adding SMU and Houston is like hitting a double and puts you in scoring position but isn't a home run because the home run is just not in the cards right now. In my opinion it is the smart move for the future of the conference, and for the future of teams like Air Force, CSU, Wyoming, and New Mexico. But it doesn't look like it will happen anytime soon because the MWC isn't sure of what it is right now or where it's going. It's a sad state to see after being such a hot conference just a few months ago.
***
Jeremy (impartial):
All good points, Ben. Assuming an undefeated MWC team is going to make a BCS game then staying pat is the right business move. There is too much risk trying to add a few million bucks with 12 teams if an undefeated MWC team trips up in a conference title game and thus loses out on the BCS cash. Stay at 10 and hope Hawaii and Nevada can build on their recent success and attempt to make the MWC stronger.
***
Kevan (Boise State):
As someone who has followed Hawaii and Nevada closely for the past few years, I find that last sentence hilarious. And, upon further introspection, quite sad.
The Mountain West Conference Power Poll (and UNLV)
Each voter ranked the Mountain West teams numbers one through eight. Here are the individual ballots from each voter because transparency is all the rage and Jeremy of Mountain West Connection really appreciates your hate mail. It validates him.
- Boise State (7)
- TCU
- San Diego State
- Air Force
- Colorado State
- UNLV
- Wyoming
- New Mexico
The homer voter of the week: Matt from Wyoming's Cowboy Altitude blog. Matt voted his Cowboys No. 5 in the conference, a full two spots higher than anyone else voted them.
Your turn
Do you think the Mountain West should add any more teams? Hope Floats - thumbs up or thumbs down? Were you able to finish reading this post in under 30 minutes? Share your thoughts in the comments.
54 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wait, I thought "Hope Floats" was a Reese Witherspoon movie?
I’m so confused…
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
Sweet Home Alabama is an equivalent, so you’re excused.
"I did not send you to go-kart camp." - Maury Garner
SHA > HF
Don’t girl’s in Idaho fixate on The Notebook?
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 4, 2011 7:09 PM PST up reply actions
Total reading time: 8 minutes. Do I win?
Re: Expansion – Please, please don’t add USU or UTEP. To utilize Mr. Weber’s analogy, the conference needs to know when they’re drawing a terrible hand. Adding USU and UTEP right now is like drawing a 7 of clubs and a 3 of diamonds and going all in before seeing the flop because you’re short stacked. It makes no sense. Patience is a virtue in this situation, and its possible that both BSU and the MWC learned that very difficult lesson last year during the last conference realignment.
Also, Hope Floats has got to be a terrible movie. Seeing a poster with Sandra Bullock with Harry Connick Jr. in a cowboy hat makes me slightly nauseous just looking at it. It’s nice being a girl who hates nearly all Rom Com’s….I never have to see that crap.
"Or, if boarding the bus is just too difficult for an Establishmentarian to do, get your snob school to schedule the Broncos home-and-home. Any takers?" - Pat Forde
"I don’t need a dictionary, I have an ipad, and an expensive large university education." - hrman7
Never heard of Hope Floats
That should tell you where I am at.
NO expansion at this time. Let things simmer for a while before adding more ingredients to the mystery stew that is the MWC. We don’t know what it is going to taste like in 2012, so we change it up? No.
BSU don't need smoke and mirrors to get the job done, they got orange pants.
Plus One
I don’t have a dog in this fight. But if I were advising any particular school or the conference as a whole, I say NO at this time and for the next year.
I badly WANTED the Big 10 to explode and for the Texas legislatures insisting the Pac 10 take Baylor to go back crying to Austin, and the addition of Texas, Oklahoma, et. al. It would have created any number of positive outcomes Pac 10 wise.
Utah was always the second choice. It never would have been offered if the Pac 16 had happened. BYU still might have happened, but more than likely the inaccurately named Big 10 would have taken Nebraska plus at least two of the Big East schools, and perhaps two more schools (maybe the Missouri Tigers, dunno). So the TCU invite to the Big East would also never have happened.
I think the league — barring expansion talk next summer — concentrates on improving the lower tier schools, getting a better TV contract, and better OOC scheduling for the top tier schools.
I also think that when expansion comes, if everything else stays status quo (no super conferences, etc.), that SMU and Houston (or one of those Texas schools and Tulsa) get a bid. I see the rationale for Utah State, but right now, not sure that geography is important. Not with TCU joining the Big EAST and the Pac 10 adding Colorado and Utah. Personally, I always liked the matched set Pac 10 pairings – but now folks are going by cash, not geography, so there’s no need for the MWC to remain loyal if no one else will.
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 4, 2011 6:55 PM PST up reply actions
The argument
that adding average teams doesn’t make us better is bogus. In my mind it’s about weeding out the bottom feeders. If the MWC adds teams with good potential, then they are not adding average teams, but future great teams. Boise State was probably considered an average team(if that) upon their arrival in the WAC…..which we quickly dominated. The same with TCU in the MWC. And Boise State’s succes brought teams like Hawaii, Nevada and Fresno State up. Same with the MWC and Utah, BYU, TCU and recently San Diego State. Success breeds success. And if football is competitive, programs get better. I hate to say it, but only 2 or 3 teams in any given year are competitive in the WAC.
And not in the Mountain West we are looking at 3 or 4 being competitive in any given year(assuming that San Diego State keeps it rolling). I love my broncos, but that many consecutive conference titiles is not indicitave of a competitive conference. But we should definetly go after the Texas schools. A recruiting stronghold there is a must. Nobody in the conference can afford to lose Texas.
I've always been confounded by the whole MWC/CUSA merger idea.
Aside from TV sets, what exactly does it do for the MWC? I’m glad no one championed that.
I’m surprised the BIGXII raiding the MWC didn’t come up. Does no one think this is plausible? Because I do, especially if Texas or others decide to leave in the future. Even without that I think eventually they’ll plot a course back to 12 teams, in which case it has been tossed around that BYU and Boise State could be in that mix. UTEP? I can’t believe that is a real possibility. SMU and Houston seem to makes the most sense if you want Texas recruiting, not UTEP.
In all seriousness, Karl Benson’s idea is better than most give it credit. Adding Texas-San Antonio and Texas State give you the recruiting, albeit for a lesser quality athlete, but that’s nothing a little winning can’t fix. It wouldn’t surprise me to see one of those schools as WAC champs in a few years. We all chuckle to ourselves now, but Benson has rebuilt the WAC a couple of times already. I don’t think its outside the realm of possibility.
Championships should be earned on the field, not in newspapers or computers.
By the way,
If you’re looking for a reader’s input in your roundtables, I nominate myself.
Seconded!
Championships should be earned on the field, not in newspapers or computers.
haha
Utah State isn’t expanding Romney Stadium. We (yep I’m an aggie) only average about 12,000. Not that anybody cares but I currently reside in Montgomery, Alabama and can’t wait for September 3rd! Boise St/Georgia in Atlanta and Utah St./Auburn right up the road baby.
I think he was joking... I think?
Championships should be earned on the field, not in newspapers or computers.
Hey I put Boise number one!
Why should I get hate mail?
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
Follow me on twitter!
Don't worry Jeremy
If anyone is going to get hate mail it’s me. Boise fans LOVE me. [sarcasm/] Bring it on NUGgies!!!
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
by Ben Findley on Mar 4, 2011 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Hope not Ben-I'd like to think we keep SOME perspective here.Being passionate shouldn't equate to being ugly.
I’d like to think we keep a more even strain here. Least I try to.Plus we got to keep on TCUs good side so you’ll keep sending pics of yell/cheer squad, not the cheerleaders (they’re ok) but the group doing the rotational pelvic thrusts all during Fiesta (muy caliente-but not exactly Christian, or at least not pre-Vatican II)
tvmunson
I'm assuming you are talking about the TCU Showgirls, here's a pic of them celebrating the Rose Bowl win
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
by Ben Findley on Mar 4, 2011 4:04 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
That be them! The one fourth from left I remember from Fiesta- abso-freakin'-lutely the sexiest yell-whatever team
on the planet!!!!!!!!!!!!
tvmunson
Dance team, and yes they sure are purty
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
If they're celebrating, I'M celebrating...
in my pants.
by kcam on Mar 7, 2011 9:24 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
That's as pretty a set of girls as you're going to see. All pretty, in different ways. Like The Village People for straight guys.
4th from left and last girl on right-makes me wish I was 21 again so they could turn me down for a date and make me want to kill myself.
tvmunson
Didn't notice the TCU log across beltline, close to bikini line. Hmmm-what would Jesus say, assuming
He was a Texan (which all Texans believe-ask Kinky Freedman).
tvmunson
Cool idea
For expansion, I see the arguments for both sides, so either doing it or not doing it wouldn’t really disappoint me either way (unless SJSU is involved, I’m pretty emphatically in the no category on that one). The side I lean to is a wait and see approach and I stand pat for now, there maybe being some better teams out there is my reasoning (coupled with the less than ideal candidates available now).
I fail to see the logic in the “If the Big East expands, they’ll take SMU and Houston” argument that Jacob put out. Houston maybe, but UCF is the school that will be signed sealed and delivered to the BE if Villanova decides not to bring its team up to the big boy table. TCU administration and fans aren’t going to politic for little brother to get in when most of the fanbase feels that SMU hasn’t done what it takes to deserve what we have.
That said, I think Ben’s point on what the MWC wants to be if it’s not a BCS conference is a good one. If it wants to be the league that puts an undefeated team in the BCS at least every other year, stand pat. If it wants to be the best football league that it can be from top to bottom, invite Houston and SMU. Ian’s point about kids not wanting to go to CSU just because they get carved up by TCU every year doesn’t address the real issue- families like seeing their kids play in person, so having a game in the state every year would be a definite boon to coaches who are trying to convince parents to let their kid head out to the beautiful wide open nothing that is Wyoming.
your right about central florida. they have 60,000 students.
and their sports programs are getting better.
The University of Utah is off to the Pac-12 Conference and will be in the South Division. Hopefully we will get to the first ever Pac-12 Championship Game. Jon " Bones " Jones gets his chance for the UFC Light Heavyweight Title when he faces off against Shogun Rua. Jon Jones will win.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Mar 4, 2011 4:15 PM PST up reply actions
In my opinion UCF is to the state of Florida
What Houston is to the state of Texas. They aren’t as big as UCF (56k) but they are still pretty damn big (38k).
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
There's no advantage for the Big East to take SMU or Houston
You have to remember all the basketball teams they already have. BE is already a SUPER conference in BB. It’s more likely that one of their basketball partners will add football, as they have discussed and they would go after another Florida school for the market.
TCU accomplishes everything they could possibly get from SMU and Houston, without having to diminish the pie. There’s no reason the Big East needs a championship, they don’t even necessarily need to go to 10 football schools.
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 4, 2011 6:59 PM PST up reply actions
Yup
(I’m a cranky Big East interloper here; Orange fan, but I live in San Diego)
It seems pretty clear that regardless of what Villanova does, the Big East is not going to move beyond 10 football members any time soon. And it also seems pretty clear that if Villanova choses not to move up to FBS at this time, then UCF will be invited. Beyond that, it seems like if we’re not going to move to 12 immediately, we’re going to want to spend a few years with ten football members before any further moves.
In the first case, Villanova probably will not play Big East football before 2015 (they’d be a transitional member of FBS from 2012-2014, and probably play mostly Big East schools + Temple and Penn State as an FBS independent for three seasons). UCF, on the other hand, might join as soon as 2012 if things moved quickly (though 2013 is probably more likely). So we almost certainly won’t see any Big East football expansion beyond the 10th team before 2016 (if UCF is #10) or 2018 (if ’Nova is).
And I’d certainly agree that we won’t add both Houston and SMU; we might add one of them, especially since that would make Pac 10-esque paired travel for non-revenue sports (and basketball) easier (SU/UConn, Nova/Rutgers, Pitt/WVU, USF/UCF, L’ville/Cinci, TCU/Houston).
That is one chunky kid. Think how many cigarettes you could get for him in a max prison.
Speaking of getting kids, is that Arlen Spector getting his butt chewed at a “town meeting”?
tvmunson
that's filthy
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
by Ben Findley on Mar 4, 2011 4:56 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
BCS bids
It’s very unlikely after the moves of last summer (both announced and pending) that the MWC will get a de jure automatic BCS bid. On the other hand, I think the way things fell out has given the MWC a de facto automatic bid. While the MWC hasn’t really improved (arguably it got worse, although stronger in the middle), the WAC has become a lot weaker. No one from outside the MWC or WAC has ever even come close to picking up the non-AQ BCS bid, and in the future it’s hard to see the WAC champion having a shot.
Don’t totally discount the possibility of a Houston of UCF undefeated run. They play rough non-conference schedules, but CUSA isn’t so strong top to bottom that it couldn’t happen.
Yes but even then
an undefeated MWC team would most likely be ranked higher. That is unless the OOC victories were drastically different.
"Football is a violent game played by violent people, so put a smile on your face, murder in your heart and lets go kick these f***kers in the mouth" -Dick Bumpas, TCU Defensive Coordinator
Only if that team were Boise, because of their broad name recognition. I don’t think an undefeated Nevada or UNLV is going to get preference over an undefeated Houston or UCF, since UCF is playing two BCS conference teams a year for a couple of the next few years and will have the ESPN hype machine working tirelessly for them.
As frog fans we know how annoying (and effective) that can be.
Have to agree with Ben
Even next year,after BW TCU goes and leaves the MWC a SDSU or a Fresno, HA HA, goes undefeated they would be ranked higher then Houston or UCF more times then not, because they would have had to beat Boise State along with everyone else. Once other point, other then Boise State- not counting teams that are on the way to the BCS conf. How many have gone undefeated over the last 5 years. It is very hard to do.
"Every Damn Day."- Coach Pete
It depends on a lot of things
Fresno has a decent reputation. They just never get that hump that really makes them a 10 win team consistently, plus their bowl performance just makes no sense compared to how well they can play, for example, USC during it’s national championship season. Hawaii (as a football only MWC member in the future) has already made a BCS bowl, no matter how badly they did in the Sugar Bowl, if they were the undefeated champion of the MWC, they would also be able to get in over an undefeated CUSA, IMO.
SDSU is helped by doing well in BB, so they are not a total unknown. If they continue to roll off 9-4, 10-3 seasons for the next three years, and had an undefeated season in 2016, say, they also might not be denied as MWC champs. Likewise Nevada. So it depends. Of course, I suspect Houston will continue to be well regarded, so that’s the toughest nut.
SMU could implode, or just be a solid team. People have short term memories. SMU needs to have a history of good teams, with good won loss ratios, good OOC scheduling and victories, to be there. I don’t think they are there yet, they might be by the end of the decade — not now.
Ditto Tulsa, for different reasons, but again it depends on who they beat and so forth.
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 4, 2011 7:05 PM PST up reply actions
East coralina once played 4 aq bcs schools in one year. There the only non aq team to do that.
The University of Utah is off to the Pac-12 Conference and will be in the South Division. Hopefully we will get to the first ever Pac-12 Championship Game. Jon " Bones " Jones gets his chance for the UFC Light Heavyweight Title when he faces off against Shogun Rua. Jon Jones will win.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Mar 5, 2011 2:07 PM PST up reply actions
East Carolina.
The University of Utah is off to the Pac-12 Conference and will be in the South Division. Hopefully we will get to the first ever Pac-12 Championship Game. Jon " Bones " Jones gets his chance for the UFC Light Heavyweight Title when he faces off against Shogun Rua. Jon Jones will win.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Mar 5, 2011 2:08 PM PST up reply actions
BYU plays Oregon State/Utah (Pac 12) Texas ("new" Big 10) plus Ole Miss (SEC) in 2011
They will also have a nationally televised game played at Cowboy Stadium against TCU.
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 6, 2011 11:06 AM PST up reply actions
2011 BYU is an indy, not a non-AQ conference member
It’s not unusual for Navy (like BYU going forward, an FBS indpendent with no special rules to automatically qualify for a BCS game outside of finishing in the BCS top 2) to play 4 AQ conference schools in addition to ND; they didn’t for the last couple of years and won’t again until 2013 (at least according to fbschedules.com), but it’s a lot more common for an FBS independent to play 4 AQ conference schools than it is for a non-AQ conference member.
Yes, and sort of no
I’d read the rules – just not read them carefully.
I think most folks think any team that’s not an Automatic Qualifying conference member (Pac 10, Big 12, Big 10, SEC, ACC, Big East) would be considered a non-AQ, but for the BCS, the purposes of what is a a NON-AQ conference member, you’re right about indy status.
So Navy (and now BYU) are SOL as far as the BCS goes — they need to be lumped in somewhere. Unfortunately, just as Navy gets a small bit of cash (and ND quite a bit), BYU will likely get some money (that they don’t have to share) from the BCS. But right now, they need to be in the top 14 AND would not change the auto bid that would go to the MWC, WAC, C-USA, etc., champion (unless that champ was not ranked in the top 12, et. al.).
But yes, technically and, in some respects, literally, BYU would not be a non-AQ conference team when it plays the four AQ games it’s set to play this fall. It will be a non-AQ, however. It depends on how you slice that apple.
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 7, 2011 12:04 PM PST up reply actions
Agree with Ben,
the two things to hope for are that SMU and Houston do want to come to MWC and that Texas doesnt leave the Big 12, starting a chain reaction where Boise State is left out in the middle of nowhere.
Boise State is 38-2 in my 3 years of college.
by warriorsscore110 on Mar 6, 2011 7:40 PM PST reply actions
Would a conf. championship loss knock us out of the BCS
Say the MWC expands to 12 and Boise St. goes undefeated reg season, is in the top 5, then loses the conf. championship game. That is effectively what happened this year. We were 4th in the BCS, lost to a team somewhere to the south, and moved to 11th. 11th is good enough to guarantee us the non-AQ auto bid, so you would get the added cash of the champ. game, the extra game because I can’t get enough Bronco football, and still be able to get to the BCS…I would call that a win-win. Why did all you bloggers assume one loss knocks you out of the discussion completely? It hasn’t happened before that a 1-loss non-AQ gets into the BCS, but it would have happened this year if TCU and BSU both had 1-loss.
by MyDadTeachesatBSU on Mar 7, 2011 1:17 PM PST reply actions
Probably
A conference championship game loss would cost Boise State the automatic BCS bid for the highest ranked non-AQ champ (providing they’re in the top 12 or in the top 16 and above at least one AQ conference champ; if Boise were the highest ranked non-AQ but not the MWC champion, they wouldn’t get an automatic spot). It might not knock them out of the top 14, so they’d still be around in the at-large pool. But you’d basically need a very favorable lineup of other schools available and BCS bowl selection order to actually get an at-large bid (especially since whoever beat Boise in the MWC title game almost certainly would be getting the non-AQ automatic spot).
Still isn't a reason to not expand
for the MWC, if the winner of the game gets into the BCS anyway, then its the same for them. if a 12-0 team loses to a 9-3 team, the 12-1 team would still probably be top 12 and get the auto bid over the 10-3 team, that’s exactly how it would’ve played out this year had there been a situation where BSU and TCU were both one loss teams
by MyDadTeachesatBSU on Mar 7, 2011 6:29 PM PST up reply actions
No
The BCS rule is that the non-AQ auto-bid goes to the highest ranked non-AQ conference champion, if they’re in the top 12 or in the top 16 AND ahead of at least one AQ conference champ. A non-AQ team can only get an automatic bid if it is the champion of its conference (or BCS #1 or BCS #2, but it seems extremely unlikely that a non-AQ would be ranked #1 or #2 if it didn’t win its conference; heck, it’s somewhat fluky when an AQ does it).
If TCU had lost and fallen behind Boise in the BCS rankings, Boise would have been eligible for the non-AQ autobid at 11-1 because there was no official tiebreaker for the WAC title, so Boise, Nevada, and Hawaii were all WAC champions. If both Boise and TCU had lost twice and fallen out of the top 16, #15 Nevada would have qualified for the non-AQ autobid becaue Big East champion UConn was not in the top 16. If Nevada had also lost and fallen out of the top 16, no non-AQ would have qualified for the autobid. If TCU had lost to Utah (I know they actually won 47-7, but work with me here) but TCU remained ahead of Boise in the BCS rankings, Boise still would have recieved the non-AQ autobid because Utah would have been the MWC champions and a win over TCU would not have been enough to move the two-loss (rather than 3-loss) Utes ahead of Boise.
Oh I see
I didn’t realize that there was the clause in there that it had to be a conference champion, sorry, i stand corrected
by MyDadTeachesatBSU on Mar 8, 2011 9:52 AM PST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on One Bronco Nation Under God
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
FanShots
Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.
Recommended FanShots
Recent FanShots
2012 Boise State Football Schedule
@ Michigan State  |
Fri 08/31 | 6:00 p.m. MT |
| Miami (OH) | Sat 09/15 | 2:00 p.m. MT |
| BYU |
Thu 09/20 | TBA |
| @ New Mexico | Sat 09/29 | TBA |
| @ Southern Miss | Sat 10/06 | TBA |
| Fresno State | Sat 10/13 | 1:30 p.m. MT |
| UNLV | Sat 10/20 | 1:30 p.m. MT |
| @ Wyoming |
Sat 10/27 | 1:30 p.m. MT |
| San Diego State | Sat 11/03 | 8:30 p.m. MT |
| @ Hawaii | Sat 11/10 | 5:00 p.m. MT |
| Colorado St. | Sat 11/17 | 1:30 p.m. MT |
| @ Nevada | Sat 12/1 | TBA |
