I fully intended to write a rant about Boise State being left out of the BCS again. I was going to write that since the BCS added the their 5th bowl (2006/2007 ), Boise State is the only school to be eligible for a BCS bowl, have one or fewer losses, finish the year in the BCS top 10, AND not be chosen for a BCS bowl. I was going to write that this hasn’t just happened once, or twice, but now three times. I was going to write that in the 6 years since that 5th BCS bowl was added, Boise State has finished ranked in the BCS top-10 five times, finished the season undefeated three times and two other seasons with one-loss each. I was going to write that even with such a resume, Boise State has played in just 2 BCS bowls, winning both. I was going to list a plethora of statistics, add some charts, and I had at least a hundred word rant on how the BCS could have three sections in their rules on how “non-AQ’ school can’t make a BCS bowl and couldn’t add a single line on how to keep a 4-loss unranked AQ school from making a mockery of the BCS.

I was all set to write all this great stuff…….. and then a simple question was posed to me…

http://collegefootball3andout.yardbarker.com/blog/collegefootball3andout