Boise State playbook: The art of defending the Air Force triple option
There is no stopping the Air Force triple option offense. There is only surviving it and limiting it and praying that you guessed right on your assignment against it. Air Force is as good an option team as you will see, and it just so happens that the AFA will be facing one of the best defenses you will see. Irresistible force, meet immovable object ... only on Versus!
I don't pretend to have the answers for stopping the Falcons, but there are some tactical advantages that can help to assuage the box score. Join me after the jump for a look at some option defense strategies.
"I think Air Force is as good an offensive football team as there is in the country," SDSU head coach Rocky Long said.
Now, Rocky Long says a lot of things that I don't think you should believe (blue uniforms make life impossible, unicorns don't exist, he was born in 1950), but he is right on with this Air Force team. The Falcon offense is that good. The temptation would be to look at the Falcons' 3-3 record and think that AFA is not a dangerous team, so resist temptation. They are good. Tell your neighbors.
Before I get into the nuts and bolts of option defense, here is a propaganda film of Air Force excellence taken from the Falcons' 2009 bowl win over Houston.
For those of you scoring at home, the triple option offense generally looks like the below diagram, with the options of a fullback dive, a quarterback keeper, or a pitch. Air Force will make it look a lot more difficult than this diagram.
Defending the triple option, a layman's view
What I wouldn't give to sit in on a Boise State defensive meeting this week to hear the genius spilling out of Pete Kwiatkowski's overflowing cup of strategy. The Bronco D will have a gameplan that is exponential levels of awesomeness greater than mine. Kwiatkowski has the mind of a defensive savant. I have a Gamecube. Consider this your disclaimer.
And now, an idiot's guide to defending the triple option, as written by an idiot.
Step No. 1: First down is the best down
Triple option offenses, like most offenses, struggle to convert third and longs. Option offenses in particular have a harder time because the majority of their yards come on the ground, and it's harder to gain huge chunks running rather than passing.
Air Force is unique in that they have a quarterback, Tim Jefferson, who can pass worth beans and pick up third and long through the air. Holding firm on first down is still a sound strategy for the Boise State defense, but it is not the be-all, end-all that it might have been in previous years.
Step No. 2: Have a really good nose tackle
The first option in Air Force's triple option is usually an inside handoff to the fullback. Having a defensive player who can wreak one-man havoc in the middle makes this first option look less and less appealing for the offense and it prevents the interior offensive linemen from getting out to their blocks on linebackers and defenders at the second level. Good defensive linemen ruin everything, and it all begins in the middle.
Now, Boise State does not have a nose tackle in its standard 4-2-5 defense. But that ain't no thing. Remember back to the Georgia game and the Big 3-4 defense that the Broncos debuted? That defense can easily transition into a 5-2 front, which is perfect for option defense.
In the above diagram, Chase Baker is playing nose, and he's questionable for Saturday's game. If Baker can't go, you could see backup Mike Atkinson fill in here. Personally, I think it would be highly effective to place Billy Winn over the center and let him go to town.
Step No. 3: Take something away
Turning a triple option offense into a double option offense makes life a lot easier on the defense. This can be performed either by winning one-on-one matchups in key spots (like nose guard on center) or by forcing the offense's hands by making the quarterback choose a specific read.
It will be interesting to see what the Broncos choose to take away. The keystone to a triple option offense is typically the fullback, but Air Force's fullback position is probably the weakest of its skill players. Quarterback Tim Jefferson and running back Asher Clark are the obvious strengths. What's a defensive coordinator to do? Call 546-9537. I have some theories. (No calls after 9:00 p.m. please.)
Step No. 4: Identify the weakest player
We know it's not Jefferson or Clark, so once again, the onus falls on the fullback or the O-line. Kwiatkowski will know where to attack by the time he has finished his film study, and you can expect the gameplan to involve heavy emphasis on the weakling.
Step No. 5: Don't blitz
A triple option offense will get on top of you fast enough without you sending defenders flying toward and past the ball.
Step No. 6: Don't panic
Triple option offenses will get their yards. Air Force gained over 400 against TCU in a 35-19 loss earlier this year and 400+ against San Diego State in a losing effort last week.
A word about assignment football
Chances are that you will hear one of the game announcers mention "assignment football" on Saturday, and just know that the person saying it might not know what he's talking about. In a pair of superb pieces at Smart Footballand The Birddog, bloggers have explained how triple option offenses pick up on your assignments and adjust their strategies in-game to take advantage. For example, in a Georgia Tech - Georgia game, a Bulldog safety tackles the pitch man on a triple option play. The next snap, GT changes its scheme to block the safety and runs the exact same play for a score.
So if you're going to play assignment football, be prepared to at least change your assignments throughout the course of the game. Option offenses will figure you out. Check the quarter mark of the below video for proof that Air Force knows how to adjust.
Additional reading
While doing some Googling for this article, I came across a couple helpful articles. One is from our friends at Dawg Sports who face Georgia Tech's triple option wishbone thingamajig once a year. The other is from a Georgia Tech blogger who had some excellent insight on the option. Here's an excerpt:
This offense isn't a one hit wonder, not a guillotine, though it can be. Its basic philosophy is to stab you with daggers in as many ways as possible, until you die. Slow or quick death, it matters not.
If you really want to get into the ins and outs of Air Force's offense, take a gander at their 1998 offensive playbook and the 1995 version from former coach Fisher DeBerry. Then be prepared to wow the guy next to you at the game who is still trying to figure out where the ball is.
Miscellaneous
Tyler Shoemaker was wide open for both of his touchdown catches against Colorado State. On the second one, the Broncos ran one of my favorite plays - a fake WR screen. To run this properly, you have to set up the defense, and the Broncos did this by throwing the actual screen several times earlier in the game. Once the defense gets used to the look, the Broncos call for the fake. The initial set-up is the same except Tyler Shoemaker fakes his block and then sprints downfield on a deep route. With the corners attacking the screen (and a tasty pump fake from Kellen Moore), Shoooooooe is wide open.
How many of you recognized Doug Martin's 65-yard touchdown run on Saturday? It was the same one he scored against Nevada. And I mean, exactly the same. Boise State set up in the same formation - trips to the wide side of the field with a tight end on the line to the near side. The Broncos pulled their playside guard and center (a common blocking scheme that I've outline before), and BSU simply outnumbered the Rams. I like to think that Brent Pease knew this was a touchdown before the ball was even snapped.
And then there was that beautiful fake punt. The way Colorado State lined up made things pretty easy on the Broncos. Note the lack of people in the middle of the field. Boise State pulled its left guard (in this case, Hunter White) who led Shoemaker upfield. The right guard made a key block in washing his man down the line of scrimmage to make the hole.
And of course if you want to see any of these plays live, check out the highlights video.
Your turn
What do you know about defending the triple option? Any tips and tricks you care to pass along? What did you notice from the Colorado State game that caught your eye? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Update: As I suspected, I did not even begin to cover all the different ways to defend the triple option. Reader comments were very helpful, and they included nuggets like a) tackle better, b) get good support from your safeties and corners, c) play good man-to-man coverage, and d) miscellaneous. Seriously, there are a lot of different ways to stop the option. I suggest reading the comments as a postscript to this story.
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Role of the linebackers
Although the nose tackle often plays an important role in the triple option, the linebacker plays really stop triple option offenses from busting long runs. The outside linebacker needs to keep containment, and try to force the quarterback inside where he is engaged by the middle backer. If they both the QB and RB get outside the OLB without being engaged there will likely be a huge run. I would be surprised to see Coach K use a number of people as OLB for the game.
We ran the triple option in high school at Melba
along w/ the wishbone. One of the keys for the D is the CB and safety play. CB’s will often have to play contain on the RB while the safeties cover receivers. Only problem with defending the triple option, passing-wise, is once the CB’s play up on the line, it opens up the option pass. I remember quite a few option passes we ran back in ‘89-’93…make it look like we were running the option. Our QB would take a step or two like he was running and then pull up and hit the WR, usually streaking down the sideline.
I hate everyone equally...especially Vandals!
Follow me on Twitter: @BSUFlyboy
That's the one that worries me most
Especially since a CSU receiver got behind our guys three times Sat. and would have scored easily had the ball not been overthrown.
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
THIS...
"Every Damn Day."- Coach Pete
....."The future belongs to those who prepare for it today..." TODAY IS THE TOMORROW THAT I EARNED YESTERDAY!!!! LEGGGOOO.....{E.A.T.}
Elevate at All Times"-George Iloka
by Broncograd96 on Oct 18, 2011 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions
And don't forget about the
option reverse. There’s so many things you can do w/ the triple option offense if you know what you’re doing. And obviously AF runs it to perfection. That’s why I’m more worried about this game than any other conference game, TCU included. Like Kevan said above…the defense HAS to play assignment football, otherwise it’ll be a lonnnnng day…
I hate everyone equally...especially Vandals!
Follow me on Twitter: @BSUFlyboy
Rip Everyone on Every Play
This is one of those games (with all due respect to our Armed Forces boys) where you get to rip everyone despite them not having the ball (including the QB). Put the fear of Byron Hout in the QB and he’ll be giving to the dive or pitching on every play.
Rip the pitch man a couple times and he starts to think twice about where Crawford/McClellin are as opposed to catching the pitch, and then turnovers start to plague the option.
I think your best point is also not to be overly aggressive, you end up too deep and the play is gone. Outside contain is huge, keep it inside. Plug the middle with the Bacon, and put Shae and Crawford on the outsides to force the play inside. Let the backers rip’em all. This is one of those games I wish Venable could have been around for.
I gurantee you that
the Air Force quarterback could care less how hard he gets hit. He will bounce back up and keep playing ball, and it will not effect his reads whatsoever.
I get that these are tough guys but...
If anyone gets hit hard enough they sometimes do not get up—at least for a while. cf. A. Dalton, Fiesta part deux. Thanks, K. Wilson for the memories.
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
Secondary/Open Field Tackling Key to Option
Great article. Love the breakdown. “Assignment” football, as you correctly point out, is an over simplification of the process. Discipline, open field tackling, and secondary play are, in my opinion, the key to defending the option. In traditional offenses, no one player is assigned to the quarterback. The offensive line is utilized as a unit to contain the QB, leaving an extra person to either blitz, key, or double team another player. This player is usually a safety, although a nickle is perfect for this role with both tackling ability and speed. If you have strong corner play (corners who can play consistently one-on-one), and great open field tacklers, you can reassign this possition to key on the QB as a runner. It doesn’t have to be a predictable assignmen, but as the video of the Huston vs. AFA bowl game showed, if just one defender thinks he the offense has committed to a particular runner and pulls off of his assignment to gange tackle, the tripple option will eat him up. The QB is hungrily watching for that exact scenario. Scenario: Quarterback play actions to the full back in an attempt to draw the nickel to the center of the line, but sweeps left with the tail back. He’s looking for the “assignment” players and, in the perfect scenario, looks for indecision, and/or movement to double team. Then, it’s just pitch or run to the open spot. It’s usually two-on-two here and the inability to be disciplined or open field tackle is an advantage to the offense.
"In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing."
Teddy Roosevelt, the great optimist.
by Glass Half Full on Oct 18, 2011 1:20 PM PDT reply actions
Solid DL play is absolutely crucial to stopping the option
UGA’s Abry Jones at 16 (!!!) tackles against Tech last year playing DE. Athletic DL play gets you in the backfield and allows you to disrupt the pitches, run the play down from behind, or force the play into the boundary. Boise’s line is best suited for the kind of slashing, penetrating, attacking D that gives option teams fits.
Also, unless AFA has a strong passing compliment to its ground game, lots of teams have replaced their CBs with Safeties against option teams. You want to get lots of tacklers on the field.
Everything starts with stopping the dive. An option team will get its yards, but you’re not really in trouble unless the dive is working.
DL get to go all out on every play, allowing the LBs and DBs to let the play come to them. With Boise’s line, I expect to see heavy outside containment and a real reliance on the uglies to defeat the option from the inside out.
Good luck, Broncos.
I'm with you
We have fast athletic DEs and I see them being key in disrupting the option between the QB and HB. Jamar Taylor and QEB, our DB’s, may be better tacklers than cover guys so I think they’ll both do well with the open field, solo tackling that is needed to keep the HB from making to many big gains.
by 4EverBleedBlue on Oct 18, 2011 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't forget Hightower
Now that his redshirt has been burned I can’t wait to see him play more, the guy looked like a beast on the tackles he made against CSU.
by ninjamonkey1 on Oct 18, 2011 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Defending the Triple Option?
Simple: outscore ’em
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
by kcam on Oct 18, 2011 1:28 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Thanks, Kevan.
I understand most offenses, but the nuances of the Triple Option have had me a little confused for years. This cleared it up.
"I don’t need a dictionary, I have an ipad, and an expensive large university education." - hrman7
"They're part pep rally, part freak show..." - Jim Rome, on Bronco Nation
Ah, strategy
So much better than realignment rumors.
"Where are you from?"...
"I'm originally from Boise, Idaho."...
"Oh, so what's it like being from the Midwest?"...
"Idaho's not really in the Midwest."...
"Oh...so you like potatoes?"
-excerpt from a conversation I have weekly with New Yorkers.
Go Broncos!
RE: Sho's fake punt run.
It was beautiful and all, but what was he doing at the end of the run? If that had been Burroughs or Potter I think they would have turned on the jets and tried to make the punt returner tackle them by himself in stead of coming to a complete stop to try to make a move to the inside. Plus the fumble, that was the ugliest great play I’ve seen in a while.
by 4EverBleedBlue on Oct 18, 2011 1:58 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed!
I watched the game again last night. I’ll bet he caught hell from the coaches for carrying the ball so carelessly. Who did he think he was? Frickin’ Deion Sanders?
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
Very disappointed in Shoe;should have know that SOMEONE was closing in. He was futzing around like a grandmother
looking for laundry. Did he think he was going to score?
tvmunson
I took less tiem figuring out my first brassiere clasp.
tvmunson
by tmunson on Oct 18, 2011 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The only game in recent memory, nay, even remote, that I saw the Broncos unprepared was the '01 game against
Rise, who ran this scheme. We simply did not know who to “take”; assignments had simply not been worked out. It ws an embarassment. Coach K and Pete were here, and I assume recall it. Great writeup, exposition KL. It is interesting that despite the various schemes, fundamentals are still fundamentals, and with this one, DL penetration, it doesn’t get much more fundamental than that.
tvmunson
First Rice game
they thumped us.
the second Rice game….we thumped back.
by ElPepeGrande on Oct 20, 2011 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Great analysis
as usual Kev. If I were coaching, and I am not for good reasons, I would stick us in the Base 4-2-5. No blitzing as you mentioned earlier. That leaves for our lb (either strongside or MLB not sure which takes that) for the dive man, the end must never bite down, the end Crawford and McClellin ALWAYS have the quarterback, and our corner always has the pitchman. IT is when the d-end decides to help out the linebacker on the dive that the QB pulls the ball and it is a 20+ yard gain. And the corner must fight off the block to take the pitch man and hold things up for the NB or the rest of the cavalry to arrive. The option is so simple to defend, but when one person decides to help another, it all falls apart and that is what makes the option tough. Everyone has a gap assignment, or the qb or the pitchman. Simple as that. And as for the passing game, the corners, safeites and nickle must read the offensive tackle to determine pass/run, not the backfield
also
Johnathan Brown will have a good game. Look for him to clean up alot of the runs that the conrers turn in towards the d. He must be on the scene soon to help out. And we also nd to force three and outs. Keeping an option offense on the field for long periods of time really wears down a defense
That makes sense
But a question: When we can score so quickly—like 2:30 minutes—that puts those D guys right back out there. Do we want long, time-consuming drives or quick strikes to get out ahead early?
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
by kcam on Oct 18, 2011 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Do you think Coach Pete thinks like that? I think he goes with wha tworks and if we score in .3 seconds so be it.
He expects guys to play as does Coach K. Only time that he alters style is when game is won and he lets Wright pound it until end.
tvmunson
He's got faith in the team depth
So do I.
I'm the tallest soccer player in NCAA history.
by sczmbz on Oct 18, 2011 5:13 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
no
we must not change our offensive strategy at all. if we score in 2 minutes, so be it. If our defense plays assignment football we will get off the field when we need to, plain and simple
Agreed
"Every Damn Day."- Coach Pete
....."The future belongs to those who prepare for it today..." TODAY IS THE TOMORROW THAT I EARNED YESTERDAY!!!! LEGGGOOO.....{E.A.T.}
Elevate at All Times"-George Iloka
by Broncograd96 on Oct 18, 2011 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Option defense has always seemed to me a little like squeezing toothpaste; start at bottom, roll up.
First, stop dive. Next, make QB pitch, and flatten him whether he does or not. He’ll screw the pitch up eventually,and whether they admit it or not the option has an inherent bias towards keepng the ball in QBs hands. D-line has to fire at them, make the fight on their territory. Fundamentals stay the same but in new guise. I think our front 7 has the precise artillery to blow this thig up as it attacks our strengths IMO. We’re very responsive; to beat us with the run I think you come right at us-this doesn’t look promising. But it does have one thing-they can eat clock.
tvmunson
This is all kinds of right.
The pressure is on the D to attack on the line and stay sound behind it. Even moreso, I think you’re right to highlight the pressure that a proficient ground game puts on opposing offenses. Kellen and Co. will have to be efficient with their scoring chances because the clock will be running when Air Force has the ball. It’s hard to get in an offensive rhythym when you’re sitting on the bench for 10 minutes.
by first and thom on Oct 18, 2011 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions
The Falcon offense is that good. The temptation would be to look at the Falcons’ 3-3 record and think that AFA is not a dangerous team, so resist temptation. They are good. Tell your neighbors
Exactly right.
They’re problem lies on the other side of the ball.
10th ranked offense in the nation.
103rd ranked defense.
"We gave up a couple of scores at the end of the first half and we don't like to let teams feel like they're really in it," - Tyler Shoemaker, on winning.
Good point, Mikrino
The AFA offense isn’t really designed for a shootout. I hope our D is rested.
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
I'd say it differently: AFA can only expect to win shootouts.
That offense doesn’t handle the 2 minute drill that well – but it sure produces lots of points.
A team that combined the TO with sound defense would be formidable indeed. It just seems like option teams (which are really just the service academies and GaTech) have problems on defense. Modern defensive schemes require exceptional athletes, and these teams can’t seem to get enough of those to let their defense play up to the standard of their offense.
by first and thom on Oct 18, 2011 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I get your point
I think we’ll see a lot of run emphasis from Pease and sustained drives. (hopefully)
You cannot reason a man out of something he didn't reason himself into in the first place.
We have no shortage of fast, smart guys to plug in...
maybe guys like Ioane aren’t ready to soak in the whole defensive scheme but in a game like this I think the subs can learn to attack this specific team…
The Bulldogs had no answers, so they called timeout. And at that moment, every single person in the stadium knew that Georgia was in over its head. It was instant singularity of Boise State's greatness.
-Kevan Lee
by TooMuchYoung on Oct 18, 2011 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't think they'll give your D too much trouble.
But I fear that AFA may give you fans some serious heartburn. It’s maddening as hell to watch that offense work, especially when the option can actually isolate one player and option off him. When it’s blocked and run correctly, the offense literally can’t be stopped. I think you guys will keep it from being blocked and run correctly, but keep some Tums on hand.
by first and thom on Oct 18, 2011 5:09 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
we are a pretty tightly wound bunch as it is….if AF strings some long gut-wretching drives together we may go insane….
How is the triple option in the red zone? It would seem as everyone can get closer to the line of scrimmage that it would be easier to defend. Anyone know AF’s red zone conversion percentage?
The Bulldogs had no answers, so they called timeout. And at that moment, every single person in the stadium knew that Georgia was in over its head. It was instant singularity of Boise State's greatness.
-Kevan Lee
by TooMuchYoung on Oct 18, 2011 5:55 PM PDT up reply actions
they score touchdowns on 68% of red zone trips...
I am not sure how good this is?
The Bulldogs had no answers, so they called timeout. And at that moment, every single person in the stadium knew that Georgia was in over its head. It was instant singularity of Boise State's greatness.
-Kevan Lee
by TooMuchYoung on Oct 18, 2011 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions
With the Bronco's and their 1st quarter blitzkrieg, AFA will have to make adjustments on offense.
Boise State’s best defensive gameplan against the option will be to jump out a 28-0 1st quarter lead, and force them to throw the ball.
"We gave up a couple of scores at the end of the first half and we don't like to let teams feel like they're really in it," - Tyler Shoemaker, on winning.
I was gonna say
They gave up 59 to Notre Dame. Are they gonna score anywhere near that many points on BSU? I should hope not.
by hummerofdoom on Oct 18, 2011 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions
A few points...
1) Already mentioned but the speed and slashing ability of Shea, Crawford and Root are huge advantages here. Plus each has the ability to run the play down from behind if there is the slightest of hesitation in the pitch.
2) Illoka is built to play against the option as he has the speed, smarts, and most importantly the open field tackling of a Greek God…
3) Our guys are smart. The coaches will have the scout team running the triple option to perfection all week. Laughrea or Hedrick can run and pass out of it and show our defense all the speed it can handle. Preparation is the key here and we have the coaches and players that are smart enough and fast enough to learn this quickly.
The Bulldogs had no answers, so they called timeout. And at that moment, every single person in the stadium knew that Georgia was in over its head. It was instant singularity of Boise State's greatness.
-Kevan Lee
well..
on NCAA 12, I generally stop it with 4-3 D, shifting the LBs out and blitzing both outside LBs, then simply randomly shift my line left or right but crash middle. Seems to work most of the time.
"And don't you think it sounds stupid, When some one's treated different cause there not the same as me or you?"
"As time passes by, regrets for the rest of my life."
"I want it, I need it, Revenge is dripping from my teeth."
"Everywhere we turn more hatred surrounds us."
"Too many talk down on things they don't know."
-A7X
by Ihavenofriendzz on Oct 18, 2011 3:30 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
4-2-5 if you have depth at safety
works very well.
I'm the tallest soccer player in NCAA history.
by sczmbz on Oct 18, 2011 5:16 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Our D-Line has a significant size advantage. Clog the middle and illiminate the first of the 3 options. We need to be able to free up the linebackers to make the appropriate reads -who have been up to the task all season long. Don’t be surprised to not see many negative yardage plays from AirForce. My concern is with the deep threats across the middle on play action to freeze the safeties. They need to play pass defense first, run second.
It would be a good week to get T-N-T back to the D line
"Every Damn Day."- Coach Pete
....."The future belongs to those who prepare for it today..." TODAY IS THE TOMORROW THAT I EARNED YESTERDAY!!!! LEGGGOOO.....{E.A.T.}
Elevate at All Times"-George Iloka
by Broncograd96 on Oct 18, 2011 8:58 PM PDT up reply actions
AF = The Pitcher
Great analyses, folks, and thanks. It’s difficult for some of us to follow.
Kevan’s statement,
Irresistible force, meet immovable object.
reminds me of what Sancho Panza said in Man of LaMancha:
“Whether the stone hits the pitcher or the pitcher hits the stone, it’s going to be bad for the pitcher.”
Cool option analysis....
I definitely think we are going to be alright. Like many others here my high school team ran the triple option. I played quarterback and found that defensive linemen that were able to penetrate the backfield were always a huge problem. I definitely see this as a HUGE game for Billy Winn.
The other thing that kills the option is athletes. Players that can make athletic plays and have good football instincts. I think we have many of them, and I see this as a pretty big Boise State win….even holding air force to a season low.
Right
It is a week of the first man making the tackle.
"Every Damn Day."- Coach Pete
....."The future belongs to those who prepare for it today..." TODAY IS THE TOMORROW THAT I EARNED YESTERDAY!!!! LEGGGOOO.....{E.A.T.}
Elevate at All Times"-George Iloka
by Broncograd96 on Oct 18, 2011 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Great analysis Kevan. All of this got me thinking.
How do you stop BSU’s Offense? And how do you categorize their O?
Soviets.
Or dynamite. Or both. However, I have an easier time just blocking it out of my mind.
by first and thom on Oct 18, 2011 9:13 PM PDT up reply actions
LOL Well played, thom...
I hate everyone equally...especially Vandals!
Follow me on Twitter: @BSUFlyboy
I would classify it as a Multiple offense or a Pro Style
I have some theories on defending it, but none of them are foolproof.
"Body!" - Lars
BYU and Utah
Great comments all around.
I just remember coaches of both BYU and Utah saying that they would not miss having to prepare for Air Force. Always a headache, year in year out, my Cougar and Ute friends breathed sighs of relief when the the annual Air Force game was over. Although they prepared diligently, and faced them year after year, they rarely stopped them. They depended on outscoring them.
And those boys never give up. This will be a tough challenge for our D and they will see stuff all day that they haven’t seen before. Remember Toledo’s first drives and CSU’s spate of tricky stuff…those were one dimension plays for the most part, Air Force’s scheme is a lot more difficult because of the options available and the surprise plays once you’re concentrating on the usual dives and pitches. It’ll be fun, interesting, and…worrisome!
It will still be assignment football
only it will be disguised. BSU is the best at disguising. The Defence can do the same thing our Offence does. BSU 56- AF 17
Predictions:
Air Force will try a halfback pass.
Shea will intercept a pitch.
Kellen will lead scoring drives and put pressure on Air Force to keep up on the scoreboard.

by 



























