Boise State recruiting: When will WR Troy Ware see the field?
One strength of last year's team (and any team, really, when Kellen Moore is the QB) was the receiving corps. Led by the stretchy Austin Pettis and the flashy Titus Young, the Broncos feasted on hapless secondaries all year long. However, towards the end of the season, with Austin Pettis nursing a broken ankle and Tyler Shoemaker recovering from a hernia...the strength of the Bronco offense had become a bit of a liability. Certainly, skill and athleticism abound on the Bronco WR corps, but depth and experience do not.
The pressing need at the end of the 2009 season carried into Bronco recruiting this year as the Broncos allotted fully 2 scholarships out of as few as five to wide receivers. The lure of a Bryan Harsin offense and two more years with Heisman hopeful Kellen Moore was enough to snare two highly-touted WRs in this class. You've already heard about one of them, Matt Miller, now let's look at the other, Troy Ware, and find out just how close he may be to seeing action this Fall.
| Scout.com | Rivals.com | ESPN | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | School | Height | Weight | 40 | Stars | Pos. Rank | Stars | Rival Rank | Grade | Pos. Rank | Reviewed |
| QB Grant Hedrick | Central HS, Oregon | 6-1 | 180 | n/a | *** | 56 | *** | 5.7 | 67 | 168 | Monday |
| WR Matt Miller | Capital HS, Montana | 6-4 | 210 | 4.5 | *** | 89 | *** | 5.7 | 76 | 108 | Tuesday |
| DE Tyrone Crawford | Bakersfield JC, CA | 6-4 | 258 | n/a | *** | JC | **** | 5.8 | n/a | n/a | Wednesday |
| TE Kyle Sosnowski | Capital HS, Idaho | 6-3 | 215 | 4.78 | ** | 119 | ** | 5.4 | 40 | n/a | Thursday |
| DB Bryan Douglas | Nathaniel Narbonne HS, CA | 5-11 | 170 | 4.4 | *** | 59 | *** | 5.5 | 73 | 98 | Friday |
| DE Tyler Horn | Mountain View HS, Idaho | 6-4 | 225 | n/a | ** | NR | *** | 5.5 | 40 | n/a | Monday |
| WR Troy Ware | Vista HS, CA | 6-2 | 175 | 4.55 | ** | 144 | *** | 5.6 | 76 | 120 | Today |
Ratings courtesy of Scout, Rivals, and ESPN.
Video highlights of Troy Ware
CIF championship highlight video. Ware's one real highlight comes at the 4:47 mark...but you have
to watch the whole video to appreciate the vocal stylings of announcer Loghan Call.
High school career
Ware didn't put up the gaudy numbers at Vista High School that many have come to expect of Division 1-A recruits. This was primarily due to the fact that Ware played at a school that employed a very run-oriented offensive scheme. However, despite Vista's run-first, run-second propensities, Ware found ways to make his presence known. He was the go-to receiver on the squad as a senior and helped lead the team to a Championship game while hauling in 45 passes for 650 yards and 6 TDs. As a junior, the 6'2" 175 lbs. WR put up virtually identical numbers but did so with only 28 receptions. Ware excelled on the track as well garnering All-League nods in the Long Jump and the 200. Ware's father Tim starred at WR in the early 80s at USC before playing briefly in the NFL with the Chargers and Raiders. I think it worth mentioning that his dad is only 5'10".
Offers
Boise State, San Diego State
Interest
Arizona. Cal, Colorado State, Utah
Scouting Report
Ware's got the size...he's got the genes...now, what of his game? ESPN's venerable recruiting service had this to say, among other things:
"Ware has the size, athleticism and playing speed for the wide receiver position at the major level of competition."
That's a good start...
"He shows good production with the ability to be creative after the catch. "
I take this to mean that after the catch, he immediately starts doing Macramé...
Ware was given a 3-star rating and a 76 "Scouts Grade" (WR Matt Miller commit also was given a 76) by ESPN as well. That's all well and good, but what does Ware himself say is the best part of his game?
"My hands. I've always been pretty good at catching the ball and running routes"
So, good size, athleticism, speed, hands, and route running. Sounds like the type of wide receiver anyone would want. Being brought up in a run-oriented system probably indicates the kid has been taught how to block as well. I daresay Troy Ware looks to be the complete package.
Person Mark Johnson will most likely confuse him for
Andre Ware

Ware won the 1989 Heisman. His flat-top finished a distant 3rd.
When will Ware see the field?
This one's a toughie.
In two of the last three seasons, Boise State has elected to start true freshman at the wide receiver positions. 2007 saw the emergence of both Austin Pettis and Titus Young, which in hindsight, looked like a stroke of genius as the pair has developed into one of the most dynamic receiving tandems the Broncos have ever had. Of course, last year the Broncos burned Kirby Moore's redshirt to slightly less spectacular effect. Now, with talented receivers Geraldo Hiwat and Aaron Burks coming of redshirts, will the Broncos' receiving corps simply be too deep for true freshman to see the field in 2010? I wouldnt rule anything out.
The precedent has been set during Coach Pete's tenure: the best guy's play...and the drop-off we've seen when Young and Pettis is like the drop-off on the cliffs of insanity.
Inconceivable.
Ostensibly, Austin Pettis and Titus Young are locks at their positions, but after that it's anyone's guess. Rumor has it that Aaron Burks nearly lost his redshirt in 2009 in addition to Kirby Moore and Geraldo Hiwat can really move. Chris Potter showed towards the end of the year that he is a very serviceable sub while Tyler Shoemaker had an up-and-down season that ended early due to injury. Both Miller and Ware bring speed and height to the wide-out spot...something that Boise State finds together very seldom it seems. With Kellen Moore under center for another two years and visions of BCS title runs dancing in our collective heads, don't be surprised for a minute if Boise State adds more youth to their already puerile offensive lineup if it means better exploiting defenses and giving Kellsy another speedy, lanky target. I'll put Ware's odds of playing in 2010 at 60%
Your turn
Will we see more true freshman WRs take the field this Fall? Will Ware and Miller both play? Will neither of them play? Does this shirt make me look fat? Leave'em in the comments.
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
Potter impressed me in the Fiesta that he has taken the step
to true Div I level of play. He was the #2 behind Young. I will speculate that Burks becomes #2 behind Pettis.That leaves Mitch, Shoe and Kirby as experienced, if not accomplished, receivers. Factor in Efaw, and to a lesser extent Gallarda and what I anticpate will be a consistent, if not enhanced, reliance on the run game which features not only significant returning talent but a bright new prospect(Johnson). Now factor in Avery’s ability to catch(Martin also is good but used less so). I havent mentioned Hiwat and a couple of others. Conclusion? Leaving aside the promises made to th erecruit, it is difficult to see any reason to burn 2 redshirts at WR. Recall that when Titus and Austin started we had lost our staring 4 receivers-Rabb,James, Nannee and Shou. This year we return all plus add good to potentially excellent redshirts. A very good case can be made for burning NO redshirts at WR. You may disagree, but point to the specific flaw in my analysis. No the shirt doesnt make you look fat but it is not your color.
tvmunson
by tmunson on Feb 2, 2010 8:21 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
And one more thing
all of the WR redshirts have been chomping at the bit to play. Last eyar was probably the first year in their ENTIRE careers that they did not see competitive playing time. If Ware and Miller can beat them coming in as true frosh we are definitely (bw) in the tall cotton.
tvmunson
by tmunson on Feb 2, 2010 8:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Let him get some muscle.
The videos of TY as a freshman were amazing. He was so skinny. Let this guy get some weight during a red shirt year and then get him out on the field as a RS freshman, after Pettis and Young are graduated. I think he is the next Titus Young type player for us. Anyone else wondering why we are getting so many TE and DE recruits?
by summitkopp on Feb 2, 2010 8:41 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
that is kind of scary that
bsu doesn’t have super-reliable WRs after pettis and young. course, this could just be because they haven’t been given all the opportunities. maybe. hopefully the ones already there step it up for the 2011 season. crap. i’m looking way too far ahead. need to get through the ’10 season and the glory that could possibly be. bah.
Dr. William Block: You gotta lose the arm, Joe.
Joe: Lose the arm? What do you mean, lose the arm? My arm?
by Grindhouse on Feb 2, 2010 9:56 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Agree as to "super reliable" but that does not mean UNreliable
Pettis and Young were unreliable as true frosh; the Washington game in particular had several game changing catches dropped by both, esp Titus, who had the probelm all year and may have contirbuted to his suspension(along withe behavioral issues).Potter is reliable(when given the chance), and Kirby already is. Both had significant 3rd and “money” catches against TCU; if they can handle the best D in the country, 74,000 fans, and a nation wide BCS televised game they can handle anything this year.Mitch?-well, anyway. My money is on Burks I’ve said it here and I’ll hitch myself to it. Let’s inderstand something-having ALL returners at ALL positions is AS GOOD AS IT GETS MIS AMIS ET HOMBRES. Everything is good; 2011 will take care of itself. It’s 100 years away; our coaches ahve a couple of scholarships tucked away if any juco’s come loose. The last place we need worry is at WR(ok one of the last)..
tvmunson
by tmunson on Feb 2, 2010 10:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not ready to give up on Burroughs...
They just have to find a better way to get him in space. The screens didn’t work, but that isn’t always on the receiver…screens need blockers to be effective. Burroughs couldn’t have been doing much to shake the DBs though because there were a few times he go tackled pretty much instantaneously.
by Drew Roberts on Feb 2, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Mitch do not do anything to deserve to retain #2
He dropped a key 3rd down in Fiesta; i know the db had a hand in but it hit him in the gut. His drop against Nevada, which could have cost us the game, was inexcusable for a Div I WR. His td catch occurred when he was wide open, and he very nearly miffed that. Why do they give him so many chances when he does not deliver? I knowo he looked great in the scrimmages; I saw him. As for game play, what am I missing? Anyway the fact that we’re having this discussion about Mitch underscores what I said about redshirts. I f either of these guys come in the likeliest spot is at #3 WR. How many play sis that? I know KM has ice water in his veins, but if the #3 is in and KM has 3 other guys in the pattern that he’s thrown to for years(in Kirby’s case, his entire life) is he going to throw to a guy he’s had 5 snaps with max during practice?
tvmunson
by tmunson on Feb 2, 2010 10:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not advocating that Burroughs be given more snaps...
Just saying that he could certainly rebound from a pretty unspectacular first year.
by Drew Roberts on Feb 2, 2010 11:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kellen will find the open reciever
It doesn’t matter if he’s thrown to them 5 times or 500. Dan paul came in with little game time experience. Kellen hit him for 3 td’s like he had been starting all year.
I do agree there has to be some comfort level between them but he will go to the open guy.
by ruffneck on Feb 2, 2010 11:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Drew and ruffneck
very good points and we’re all singing in the same choir. I forgot about Paul; he makes another receiving choice. I cann attest that Chandler Koch is, at absolute minimum, a competent receiver. Which further underscores that we do not (probably) need or want to play any frosh at wr.
tvmunson
by tmunson on Feb 2, 2010 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i thought paul did catch three tds in that game
hmmm
Dr. William Block: You gotta lose the arm, Joe.
Joe: Lose the arm? What do you mean, lose the arm? My arm?
by Grindhouse on Feb 2, 2010 11:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought he got 3 too(?)Nevada right?
tvmunson
by tmunson on Feb 2, 2010 12:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
definitely 3
I remember reading an article somewhere (most likely linked to from here) that pointed out how embarrassing it must have been for Nevada’s DC when they gave up 3 TDs to the exact same person on the exact same play. cue wicked laughter
by hummerofdoom on Feb 2, 2010 12:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't remember
Maybe it was three. I thought he had two td’s and one for multiple yards. Either way, My point was, kellen spreads it around pretty good. I don’t see why they would burn any redshirts next year at WR. Also, I feel with a more established offensive line, all those weapons become more of a threat this year than last.
by ruffneck on Feb 2, 2010 3:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs














