Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

TMI: Recapping Boise State vs. Oregon with stats, plays, and etc.

Hey, there's this now!

I have been working on this Oregon wrap-up post since last week, and rather than let it die a sad death along with the other ideas I never got to (weekly Brian Murphy ghostwriting column, R.I.P.), I thought I'd let it see the light of day in a FanPost.

Warning: It's long. And educational. And full of numbers, diagrams, screengrabs, and stats. Let me know what you think of it in the comments ... if you make it that far.

Star-divide

Oregon vs. Boise State Highlights


Oregon vs. Boise State statistics

ESPN boxscore

Miscellaneous stats

  • Total Yards: Oregon: 152, BSU: 361
  • First Downs: Oregon: 6, BSU: 22
  • Yds/Play: Oregon: 3.5, BSU: 4.1
  • Yds/Poss: Oregon: 10.9, BSU: 25.8
  • Avg. Start: Oregon: 32.1, BSU: 33.5
  • Turnovers: Oregon: 2, BSU: 3
  • Swing Points*: Oregon: 0, BSU: 2
  • Yds for Points*: Oregon: 54, BSU: 144
  • Wasted Yards*: Oregon: 98, BSU: 217

*Swing Points (pts on defense, special teams or drives < 25 yds)
*Yds for Points (yards on scoring drives (including penalties))
*Wasted Yards (Yards on non-scoring drives (including penalties)

Wasted yards is what stands out most to me in these statistics. It was obvious that the Broncos left points on the table, but this stat really shows just how much they actually threw away. It is also interesting to note that Oregon barely managed enough yards per possession to gain a first down.

1st down play selection for Broncos

Stats: Boise State ran the ball 27 times on first down and passed it seven times on first down

Breakdown by quarter:

  • 1st Quarter: 7 runs, 2 passes
  • 2nd Quarter: 6 runs, 4 passes
  • 3rd Quarter: 7 runs, 1 passes
  • 4th Quarter: 7 runs, 0 passes

Think Boise State wasn't serious about establishing the run? These stats show a couple of things.

  1. Running was definitely a priority.
  2. Boise State was having success running the football. If they weren't, you would have seen those numbers start to even out after the first quarter. In the second quarter, things were most level. But in the second half, there was only one first down pass called by the Broncos: Kellen Moore's pass to Richie Brockel that resulted in a fumble.
  3. The fourth quarter numbers can be credited to the Broncos' attempt to run the clock out.

Fumbling, no thanks to themselves

Stat: Only one of Boise State's six fumbles was forced by Oregon

Richie Brockel's fumblerooski following his reception is really the only fumble you could say that Oregon caused, and even it wasn't anywhere close to a strip. Boise State's other fumbles: a botched shotgun snap, Jeremy Avery dropping a pitch, another botched snap, a botched snap on a two-point conversion, and a ball that slipped out of Moore's hands. Those unforced errors make the turnover stats look a lot different.

0904spbsuorjj12lr

via media.idahostatesman.com

Third down and relatively long for Oregon

Stat: In their five first half third downs, the Ducks needed an average of 9.4 yards for the first

It's hard enough making first downs against the Bronco defense, but it's a lot harder when you have third and long on almost every series.

Jeremiah Masoli's tendency to throw right

Stat: Masoli threw right eight of ten times in the first half

For all intents and purposes, Jeremiah Masoli had a horrible game. He was ineffective on the ground, and he was mediocre through the air. If receivers could have helped him out a little more, his numbers would have looked better than they ultimately did. Still, one night of putzing it up against the Broncos probably hurt his NFL draft stock more than he will ever know.

One of the most interesting parts to his night was his religious commitment to throwing right. There are a couple of reasons he could have done this:

  1. Oregon gameplanned to throw at Kyle Wilson, thinking he was beatable.
  2. Masoli was more comfortable throwing to Jeff Maehl, one of his most experienced receivers.

I'd like to propose a third, more likely option: Masoli had no idea what he was doing. Out of the first two options above, I seriously doubt that No. 1 is accurate. Wilson is one of the best corners in the country, throwing his way was not working even when they tried it, and there are other ways that offenses would and should attack the Bronco D. No. 2 doesn't make sense either, since Masoli had TE Ed Dickson at his disposal, arguably a better disposal than Maehl.

So we're back to Masoli having no idea what he was doing. I credit the Bronco defense for disguising its coverages. Butu I blame Masoli for not going through his progressions and not bothering to look a different way. Part of the problem might have been Chip Kelly's playcaling, but when you run a spread offense there is more than one place to throw the ball on the field than at the other team's best corner.

Boise State will motion you to death

Stat: The Broncos' 18-play first drive saw at least 12 plays use motion.

The Broncos are known for their shifting and motioning, and Thursday night was no exception. Yet for some reason, Oregon didn't seem to know what was going on. Several times they looked confused at the line of scrimmage and didn't adequately move to cover the changing offensive formation.

It should be noted that the motion statistics cannot be 100 percent accurate since ESPN has a propensity for not showing plays until they are about half over.

The most important drive of the game

At the start of the second half, Boise State received the ball with a 13-0 lead. The drive began on their 36 yard line. Here is that drive.

1 and 10 at the BSU 36

Run_right_medium

D.J. Harper started the second half as the feature back, and following a 32-yard kickoff return by Titus Young, the Broncos were set up in good field position. The importance of the opening drive cannot be understated. If Boise State went three-and-out, the Ducks would have had some good momentum to possibly jump back into things. A long drive with points, and the game would feel much more out of reach than it already was.

The first play of the drive was a simple running play to Harper. No one pulled. Everyone took the man in front of them. And Harper found a hole behind Richie Brockel's lead block to pick up five yards.

Next!

2nd and 5 at the BSU 41

Tyler Shoemaker took a swing pass in the right flat and muscled his way for three yards. The crowd was decidedly weak on its "Shoooooo" chant.

3rd and 2 at the BSU 44

Passright_medium

An absolutely beautiful play.

First off, Boise State had to have this. A three-and-out, and they were in trouble. The formation showed power with two tight ends (Efaw and Gallarda) and a blocking back (Brockel), and Oregon shifted its defense to the wide side of the field - the left side of the formation.

Efaw went in motion right, and the Oregon didn't really follow, choosing instead to defend the wide side of the field. At the snap, Kellen Moore faked a toss left to Harper, freezing the defense momentarily. At the same time, Efaw and Gallarda - both at the right side of the formation - held blocks for a second or two before releasing into their patterns. The fake blocks might not be clear from my hodgepodge play design, but they were there. I promise. Brockel went right at the snap and sat in a curl in the area that Gallarda and Efaw would eventually vacate.

The route combination between Gallarda and Efaw, coupled with the excellent play fake and blocking, proved to be key. Efaw took his route deep, driving off the outside linebacker. Gallarda came underneath Efaw's route and faded toward the sideline about eight yards from the line of scrimmage. Gallarda was covered by DE Kenny Rowe who looked lost in coverage. Kellen Moore floated a beautiful pass into Gallarda's arms for the eight-yard gain and a much-needed first down.

1st and 10 at the Oregon 48

Runrightdj_medium

This was the offense's biggest play of the game, D.J. Harper's 33-yard scamper down to the Oregon 15. The above play design is how things should have gone. Harper and the Bronco offense had to adjust a little bit.

Dsc04789_medium

The formation had a TE left with a blocking back in front of Harper (as you can read below, blocking backs for Harper was an interesting theme). Oregon gave a similar look to what it showed often throughout the night, with one safety deep and the other close to the line. T.J. Ward, Oregon's best defensive player, lined up over the tight end.

Dsc04790_medium

At the snap, Thomas Byrd got pushed deep into the backfield by a strong rush from the defensive tackle. Brockel went left, forcing the offside DE to go wide. Will Lawrence and Matt Slater performed a textbook combo block on the other defensive tackle, with Lawrence sliding off to take on LB Casey Matthews.

Harper adjusted to Byrd's block by making a hard cut left, immediately after the handoff. Harper's movement forced Oregon LB Spencer Paysinger (#35) to pursue left, taking him out of the play once Harper cut back.

Dsc04792_medium

Lawrence's block on Matthews proved to be a huge key to the success of the play. In the above picture, you can see Lawrence at the left, pushing Paysinger who is facing the completely wrong direction. Matthew's technique is not awful; defenders are taught to turn around and dig in rather than give up ground. But Lawrence completely had him beat.

Michael Ames' block turned out to be rather interesting. Facing a defender lined up to the outside of him, Ames managed to allow his guy to work across his face and all the way back into the middle of the play. Harper adjusted again by changing directions to his right, allowing Ames to continue to push his man down the line.

Dsc04791_medium

At this point, Harper has a lot of blue turf in front of him. Ames closed down his man, Lawrence still has Matthews wrapped around his finger, and all that's left is for Harper to make a man miss. That man ended up being safety Javes Lewis who had Harper dead to rights and completely whiffed.

Harper took off down the sideline for a 33-yard gain.

1st and 10 at the Oregon 15

2nd and 3 at the Oregon 8

On successive plays after Harper's run, the Broncos took it right up the middle of the Duck defense, using a trap block. On first down, Lawrence pulled right, behind the center, clearing a hole for Jeremy Avery to pick up seven. ON the next play, Boise State ran the exact same thing only reversed, allowing Kevin Sapien to pull to open a hole for Avery to gain five.

1st and goal at the Oregon 3

2nd and goal at the Oregon 1

3rd and goal at the Oregon 1

It took the Broncos three cracks to get into the end zone, but scoring a TD seemed like a foregone conclusion after the way BSU had marched down the field. Harper's TD run, an off tackle handoff to the right, behind Michael Ames, was one of the most well-done one-yard runs you will see. He had three Oregon players ready to make the tackle outside the end zone, but he spun back inside at first contact and fell across the goalline for the TD.

D.J. Harper and a fullback

Stat: D.J. Harper lines up with a fullback 80-90 percent of the time he is in the backfield

Harper and Avery are going to be a dynamic one-two punch all season long. And they apparently are going to do it with very different personnel.

Avery ran almost exclusively out of the single back set on Thursday night. Harper ran almost exclusively with a fullback. Anyone have any reasons? I'm open to anything.

0904spbsudo23
via media.idahostatesman.com

Boise State's refusal to blitz

Noted: The Broncos were able to put pressure on Masoli with the front four and an occasional extra rusher. And that's it. The rest of the defense was afforded the luxury of sitting back and waiting for Masoli ducks to float their way.

Oregon's love of the three-man front and the zone

Noted: Oregon took a similar approach as Boise State by preferring to drop defenders into coverage rather than all-out blitz Kellen Moore. In the majority of plays in the first half, Oregon brought three or four rushers, many times blitzing a linebacker and dropping a defensive end.

Here's where you can tell a big difference between Masoli and Moore. Masoli was unable to find the open man and deliver an accurate, timely throw. Moore found the open man and hit him with regularity. It's interesting how two defenses can approach the game similarly yet come away with different results because of one special player. That special player was not Masoli on Thursday.

Other odds and ends:

  • Ugh. Gray numbers on jerseys? And people thought it was hard to recognize players before.
  • Venable seemed to handle the lion's share of spying on Jeremiah Masoli. 
  • The creativity just wasn't there for the Oregon offense. Too many of the same plays. Not enough adjustments.

This content was not created by OBNUG and therefore may not meet our standards. On the contrary, it probably exceeds them.

Comment 9 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great write up.
Good job, Kevanlee

"It’s spelled E-L-F T-U-S-H"

by JShufelt on Sep 9, 2009 10:01 AM PDT reply actions  

Nicely done Kevan!

I especially loved seeing RoboMasoli twice on that video. I still can’t get over that play!

Ridonkulous!

by OBNUG Intern on Sep 9, 2009 11:11 AM PDT reply actions  

So,

Great post, but have you done away with giving out game balls? How will we survive WAC conference play without awards for ‘The Inoke Funaki Face’ or ‘Greatest Pat Hill Coaching Blunder’?

"Well, we'll just have to get to know each other a little better then. I like Ferris wheels, college football, and anything that goes more than 200 miles an hour."

by orangecircus on Sep 9, 2009 4:41 PM PDT reply actions  

I thought we got pressure too...

Moore just got off some great throws. Although our linebackers came in a little out of control.

In the end our defense made this game manageable. Brotzman should have made 1-2 (probably two more for a 3-4 performance) more field goals and the series where you guys drove down and stepped all over yourselves with the botched snaps and pitches should’ve been a touchdown. So, I think you leave 10-13 points off the board. We should’ve never ran Blount lateral in the endzone, so take away 2 points and you left 8-11 points on the board. That puts the total at 27-30 points. Considering we played a game and half of snaps – that’s an admirable performance against a prolific offense.

Our offense was just plain inept. Why we didn’t try a couple of screen plays in the first half to keep that line at bay is beyond me. Why Masoli didn’t try and look for Dickson more was beyond me as well. Why Masoli didn’t keep the ball on the option read when Blount has heading to a collasping left side of the oline was beyond me as well. A lot of this seems fixable though.

You guys should follow the Purdue game closely. If we don’t get our offense together against a Purdue team that gave up 31 points and 423 passing yards against Toledo at home, then we are going to struggle mightily.

by BisonDucks on Sep 9, 2009 5:02 PM PDT reply actions  

I don’t have ESPN so I have not been able to re-watch the game. During the game it seemd that the root of Oregon’s offensive line woes were that they were getting blown off the ball at the time of the snap. This created immediate penetration. Even on the 4th and 1 play it looked like Blount was supposed to go straight ahead, but went lateral due to penetration in that hole.

How much of this defensive advantage at the snap was caused by crowd noise and the need for a silent count? Does Oregon always use a silent count? If not, I would expect improvement in that area alone in the friendly confines of Autzen. I agree that some screen plays may have changed the pace enough to get the defense a little off balance.

As for Masoli, it seems that the Broncos not only had a spy (Venable) assigned to him on every play but they also kept a defensive end at home each time. That could be why he didn’t keep the ball much in the read option – I expect this week he will carry the ball more even if Purdue runs the same scheme. At his size he can take on the LB and still get around 4 yards a carry.

If Oregon will be satisfied with ball control and small gains to move the chains, I think they will be okay. On Thursday night it seemed they were running their scheme hoping to eventually break a big play rather than use three downs to move the ball. Thus Kevan’s stat of an average of 9+ yards to go 3rd down.

"...east and west is the problem, north and south the solution."

by MKingery on Sep 10, 2009 7:35 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Masoli definitely tried forcing too much...

but I saw plenty of opportunity for Masoli to keep and get yards no matter the spy and a DE. On the 4th and 1 play he could’ve gone for 5-6 yards. The one time he did keep the ball on the read option he got 6 while coughing up the ball.

The press is now covering the line extensively and apparently you guys came out with an entirely different scheme than they expected and Greatwood, our offensive line coach, is saying that is his fault. For a second year in a row, we got badly out-coached. Obviously, the talent is there too.

by BisonDucks on Sep 10, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

We have never been one to be predictable

Of course we are going to do something different, why do the exact same scheme as in last year’s game?

Fresno isn’t going to see what they saw in film against you guys or Miami. :)

"I'd rather be a smartass than a dumbass."

by Belexes on Sep 11, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

rec'd for agreement

I dvr’d the game. And have replayed twice. The Broncos were able to get all night with just the front four. Masoli was out of sorts from the opening kickoff, he didn’t act like himself.

Crowd noise? Partly in my opinion.

Better gameplan by Coach Pete, Harsin, and Wilcox? Most definitely.

Boise State - The best in all the land (The "land" being Idaho, and large parts of California, Oregon, and Nevada.)

by Mikrino on Sep 11, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

One Bronco Nation Under God (OBNUG) seeks to provide a source of relevant BSU news, mature BSU perspective, and biased BSU commentary with wit, reason, timeliness, and irreverence. That, and Vandal jokes.

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Hilarious SportsNation Poll.  Question: "Are you afraid of Wild Gorillas?"
 Idaho was the only state to respond "No."
Just a vid of Titus bein a baller in Detroit
Who should our favorite walk-on be? I submit to you that it should be Avery Westendorf. Turned down...
Hipster Andrew Pint may be my new favorite recruit.

Recent FanShots

Draft Profile: Billy Winn
Anyone catch the ISU football coach interview yesterday on KTIK?
Craig Thompson, Minnesota AD?
Report: Big East, West Virginia nearing a $20 million settlement - NCAA Football - Sporting News
Sounds like Joey Martarano is choosing to play football for Boise State
Air Force BBall Coach Reportedly Fired
so i clicked the rosters button from the homepage and its the roster from...
CBS reports Memphis joining the Big East in 2013

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Twitter us @obnug

Video player from BroncoSports.com

Broncos Football Schedule


Chairmen

Profilepic_small Kevan Lee

Nickuw_small Nick Kroes

Icon2_small Drew Roberts