I’d support it.

Of course, I’m still of the mind that the MWC expands to take Boise St, Fresno, and one other club (Nevada? Houston? Hawaii? Tulsa?) to become an auto-bid league.

Thinking back over previous years, a WAC-MWC title game would’ve been pretty great. BYU-BSU in ’06, BYU-Hawaii in ’07, Utah-BSU last year.

That said, it would be horrible in years like this when it looks like two non-BCS teams will play in BCS games.

I won’t become a fan of the MWC, even if we join it; solely because they don’t want to overthrow the BCS, they want to join it. A WAC/MWC championship game would be great to watch, but it would be at the expense of playing into the BCS’s hands.

I’m not for that sort of thing.

[Noteable wins] Georgia Tech-ACC (Clemson, North Carolina, Florida State, Virginia Tech and Duke.)

So, UNC, Florida State, and flash-in-the-pan Duke are quality wins?

I will give that Ga Tech’s schedule has been better than Boise’s, but at this point in the season, you can’t argue that over TCU or Cincy (can’t believe I’m defending Cincy). Of the three, they rank only above Boise in the BCS computer average.

That said, a head to head scenario Boise vs. Ga Tech would be interesting. I don’t think we’ve defended against anything like a triple option. The closest I can think of recently is Nevada’s pistol. That makes me quite a bit more comfortable about that subjective case. Add that with the fact that Ga Tech would have a hard time containing Moore, and I’ll take Boise over the Jackets. Besides, who has the 1 loss of the two?

it means a BCS auto-bid I’m in. But if not I think the whole arrangement kind of takes on a second-grade, playground feeling to it. “Nooooo, the big kids won’t let me play!” So you go start another game when you, and everyone else, knows it’s just a sub-par replacement for the real deal. Then you end up looking pathetic and it’s lame and depressing for everyone involved.

This seems like the worst option. Sure it would be an entertaining game, but it would only create a cannibalistic situation without the benefit of a BCS affiliation to give a chance to the loser. If they are going to do that, they might as well re-merge and become the old 16 team WAC. So many teams around the country could benefit from conference realignment.

Unless things are completely redesigned, Boise State is in a much better position of a BCS bid with their current setup.

According to the MWC/WAC championship proposal article, BSU and VaTech are playing Labor day next year. Did I miss something? Did they official change the day and all of bronco nation messed the memo?

The MWC needs Boise State’s past record and winning tradition.

The Broncos can stay where they are keep demoralizing WAC teams and get into BCS bowls. Maybe not every year, but eventually something has to give.

Sure they’ll continue hear the “weak schedule” argument, but they have gained the notoriety already for being a consistent winner.

I say down with the BCS , hello PLAYOFF!