Phil Steele doesn't understand All-WAC QBs either
Phil Steele's All-WAC team has been released, and it is just as misinformed as the official All-WAC team.
Steele, one of college football's elite experts, seems to have the same problem that most of the WAC's coaches had: distinguishing between a running back and a quarterback. Observe Steele's All-WAC picks:
Notice anything horribly wrong? Besides the first-team omissions of Ryan Winterswyk and Ellis Powers?
That's right, Colin Kaepernick is on Steele's first-team offense at quarterback over BSU's Kellen Moore. And to think we almost paid $6.99 for his magazine.
Read more: Phil Steele's 2008 WAC all conference [PhilSteele.com]
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
Is it normal that the second team could beat the first team? well maybe it's just me, but something seems wrong about that…
by BigBaloo on Dec 5, 2008 2:41 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Looking at the first team offense with 5 players from Nevada versus just two from Boise State if you didnt know their records you would assume Nevada was the WAC champion. Obviously this guy has not got a clue…what a d-bag.
by Brian on Dec 5, 2008 2:53 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
D-bag is right.
When a team has so many contributors and rotates talent all game long, there aren't as many superstars hogging the spotlight. I bet Boise State is the only team to have 15 or more people get receptions throughout the season. We had 4 good running backs (all would have done better with more reps, for sure). We have a linebacker corps so deep, any WAC team would salivate over it. Gingg, Acrey, Hout (DE also), Brady, Powers, even Tevis and White (ok, and Dobbs on senior day) have thrown around the WAC all season long. Steele is just another ignorant voice using a flawed system of judgment. Here's a hint: its not just numbers that make a player the best.
by pretendhuman on Dec 5, 2008 5:44 PM PST reply actions 0 recs














